Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and pathological gambling (PG) are common disorders. The cognitive models of OCD and PG focus on abnormalities in response inhibition. Although, these functions have been studied in different PG and OCD samples, no study has compared the response inhibition in both.Methods: Medication-naïve OCD (n = 61) and PG subjects (n = 109) and healthy controls (n = 131) performed CPT and Go/NoGo tasks.Results: Compared to healthy controls (HC), PG and OCD groups underperformed on speed and exhibited larger time variability on the CPT and Go/NoGo task. Only in OCD patients, a positive correlation between omission errors and response time (RT) was observed in the CPT. At the Go/NoGo task, a negative correlation between false alarms and RT (a fast-errors trade-off) was significant only in the PG group. The HC group had greater sensitivity values (d') than the OCD and PG groups in the Go/NoGo task. The PG group displayed lower d' values and more conservative response criterion in the CPT. In addition, only the OCD group expressed a high switching cost compared to both the PG and HC groups in terms of the RT and d' values.Conclusions: Both the PG and OCD groups demonstrated impaired response inhibition compared to the HC group. On several measures, the OCD and PG groups showed comparable impairments, and in others these were distinct. Thus, it appears that distinct neurocognitive patterns are involved in performance of the CPT and the Go/NoGo tasks among OCD and PG subjects whose cognitive status is currently under intensive investigation.

Highlights

  • People that suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and pathological gambling (PG) are representing an opposite persistent and maladaptive behaviors [1, 2]

  • Our results show that only the PG patients showed a significant negative correlation between false alarms and response time (RT) in the Go/NoGo task

  • Our findings have clinical implications that the measures of the Continuous Performance Tests (CPT) and the Go/NoGo task linked with each symptom dimension, hypothesized to underlie the development and maintenance of the symptoms, can be targeted in treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People that suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and pathological gambling (PG) are representing an opposite persistent and maladaptive behaviors [1, 2]. The PG is associated with diminished self-control, risk-seeking behavior, and insensitivity to punishment and harm minimization [4]. Compulsivity and Impulsivity as Polar Opposites of a Continuum. Compulsivity and impulsivity have been viewed as fundamentally distinct phenomena that represent a single continuum [2]. The cognitive models of OCD and PG focus on abnormalities in response inhibition. These functions have been studied in different PG and OCD samples, no study has compared the response inhibition in both

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call