Abstract

AbstractA general shift towards higher mineralogical and textural maturity changes the reservoir character across the Triassic–Jurassic transition in the southwestern Barents Sea basin (SWBSB), largely affecting the hydrocarbon prospectivity in the region. Petrographic and geochronological provenance data presented in this paper suggest that the shift from mineralogically immature to mature sandstones initiated during the deposition of the Norian–Rhaetian Fruholmen Formation, and varies with basin location. Strong contrasts between the Fruholmen Formation and underlying formations are associated with proximity to the rejuvenated Caledonian and Fennoscandian hinterlands and are mainly restricted to the southern basin margins. In the basin interior, subtle petrographic variations between the Fruholmen Formation and older Triassic sandstones reflect a distal position relative to the southern hinterland. The long‐lived misconception of a regional compositional contrast in the Arctic at the turn of the Norian can be attributed to higher sampling frequency associated with hydrocarbon exploration activity along the southern basin margins, and masking by increased annual precipitation and subsequent reworking during the Jurassic. Geothermal signatures and rearrangement of ferric clay material across the Carnian–Norian transition support a recycled origin for the Fruholmen Formation in the basin interior. As the closest tectonically active region at the time, the Novaya Zemlya fold‐and‐thrust belt represents the best provenance candidate for polycyclic components in Norian–Rhaetian strata. In addition to recycling in the hinterland during the Late Triassic, local erosion of exposed intrabasinal highs and platforms at the Triassic–Jurassic transition represents a second process where thermodynamically unstable mineral components originally sourced from the Uralides may be removed. Textural and mineralogical modification may also have occurred in marginal‐marine depositional environments during periods with elevated sea level. Mature sediment supply from the rejuvenated hinterland in the south, multiple cycles of reworking and gradual accumulation of polycyclic grains have likely led to the extreme compositional maturity registered in the Tubåen, Nordmela and Stø formations in the SWBSB. It is likely that increased annual precipitation since the latest Carnian had an amplifying effect on sandstone maturation across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary, but we consider the effect to be inferior compared to provenance shifts and reworking. Findings from this study are important for understanding compositional and textural maturity enhancement processes in siliciclastic sedimentary basins.

Highlights

  • Over a 30-million-year period, the southwestern Barents Sea basin (SWBSB) went from being dominated by high rates of sedimentation and accommodation in the Triassic to the development of regionally condensed sections characterized by low sedimentation rates and bypass in the Early-Middle Jurassic (Ryseth, 2014)

  • The Triassic succession deposited while the Novaya Zemlya area formed a basin at the northern edge of the Polar Uralides can likely account for the Uralide-aged zircons recorded in recycled Norian–Rhaetian sandstones from the basin interior

  • Our study indicates that previously recorded petrographic contrasts across the Early Norian flooding surface in the southern basin margin arise from a local shift in provenance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over a 30-million-year period, the southwestern Barents Sea basin (SWBSB) went from being dominated by high rates of sedimentation and accommodation in the Triassic to the development of regionally condensed sections characterized by low sedimentation rates and bypass in the Early-Middle Jurassic (Ryseth, 2014) Accompanying this major shift in basin configuration is an extensive mineralogical and textural maturation of sandstone packages that have been registered throughout the Greater Barents Sea (Fleming et al, 2016; Flowerdew et al, 2019; Mørk, 1999). The majority of published petrographic studies from Upper Triassic and Jurassic successions in the SWBSB has been conducted in areas open to hydrocarbon exploration activity, which, until recently, has concentrated around the southern margins of the basin In these areas, infill differences between the Triassic and Jurassic periods have been attributed to rejuvenation of the Fennoscandian and Caledonian hinterlands, increased annual precipitation and reduced subsidence rates (Ryseth, 2014).

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call