Abstract

When talkers speak in masking sounds, their speech undergoes a variety of acoustic and phonetic changes. These changes are known collectively as the Lombard effect. Most behavioural research and neuroimaging research in this area has concentrated on the effect of energetic maskers such as white noise on Lombard speech. Previous fMRI studies have argued that neural responses to speaking in noise are driven by the quality of auditory feedback-that is, the audibility of the speaker's voice over the masker. However, we also frequently produce speech in the presence of informational maskers such as another talker. Here, speakers read sentences over a range of maskers varying in their informational and energetic content: speech, rotated speech, speech modulated noise, and white noise. Subjects also spoke in quiet and listened to the maskers without speaking. When subjects spoke in masking sounds, their vocal intensity increased in line with the energetic content of the masker. However, the opposite pattern was found neurally. In the superior temporal gyrus, activation was most strongly associated with increases in informational, rather than energetic, masking. This suggests that the neural activations associated with speaking in noise are more complex than a simple feedback response.

Highlights

  • When two people try to strike up a conversation at a loud party, the background noise “masks” the sound of the talker’s own voice, either by physically occluding the signal or by acting as a distractor, and leading to central competition for resources

  • We found no neural profiles that correlated with the direction of behavioural vocal modification, i.e., where the greatest response was to talking in continuous noise, and the weakest response was to speaking against another talker

  • Contemporary neural accounts of speech production propose that superior temporal cortex acts as an auditory error monitor during talking

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When two people try to strike up a conversation at a loud party, the background noise “masks” the sound of the talker’s own voice, either by physically occluding the signal or by acting as a distractor, and leading to central competition for resources. In such a situation, the talker usually responds by changing the intensity, pitch, and spectral properties of her voice to make it more intelligible—a partly automatic response known as the Lombard effect (Lombard, 1911).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.