Abstract

EEG has been central to investigations of the time course of various neural functions underpinning visual word recognition. Recently the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) paradigm has been increasingly adopted for word recognition studies due to its high signal-to-noise ratio. Such studies, however, have been typically framed around a single source in the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT). Here, we combine SSVEP recorded from 16 adult native English speakers with a data-driven spatial filtering approach—Reliable Components Analysis (RCA)—to elucidate distinct functional sources with overlapping yet separable time courses and topographies that emerge when contrasting words with pseudofont visual controls. The first component topography was maximal over left vOT regions with a shorter latency (approximately 180 ms). A second component was maximal over more dorsal parietal regions with a longer latency (approximately 260 ms). Both components consistently emerged across a range of parameter manipulations including changes in the spatial overlap between successive stimuli, and changes in both base and deviation frequency. We then contrasted word-in-nonword and word-in-pseudoword to test the hierarchical processing mechanisms underlying visual word recognition. Results suggest that these hierarchical contrasts fail to evoke a unitary component that might be reasonably associated with lexical access.

Highlights

  • EEG has been central to investigations of the time course of various neural functions underpinning visual word recognition

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reliably localized an area of the left lateral ventral occipitotemporal cortex that is selective to printed words relative to other visual stimuli such as line ­drawings[3] and f­aces[4,5,6]

  • Numerous Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have proposed that the ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT) follows a hierarchical posterior-to-anterior progression, with posterior regions being more selective to visual word form processing while anterior parts are more weighted to high-level word ­features[5,12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

EEG has been central to investigations of the time course of various neural functions underpinning visual word recognition. For conditions 4 and 5, word deviants appearing in the other two contexts (word-in-nonword, wordin-pseudoword) produced components with weaker responses that were associated with distinct topographies, consistent with the hypothesis that each contrast was associated with overlapping yet distinct neural sources (Fig. 6).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call