Abstract

In Western countries the majority of gastric cancers (GC) are usually diagnosed in advanced stages reporting a 5-year survival rate of only 26%. The Laurén classification of GC was most widely used in clinical practice since it reflects GC morphology, epidemiology, tumor biology, clinical management and outcome. Despite the initial promise of individualizing antitumor treatment, the management of GC still remains relatively broad and general. Apart from clinical staging, molecular profiling enables targeting of the identified underlying alterations, rather than histology. In contrast to breast carcinoma, molecular classification of GC does not yet imply treatment modality. Molecular classifications of GC and their therapeutic implications are therefore extensively studied. The current proposed molecular divisions of GC come from three different parts of the world where different standard treatment modalities for advanced GC are recommended. Wider use of GC molecular subtyping may solve problems, such as susceptibility to novel systemic therapy regimens or selection of patients for aggressive surgery and targeted adjuvant/conversion therapy. In any case, the rapid entry of novel molecular targeted therapies into routine oncology practice clearly underscores the urgent need for clinicians to be aware of these new possibilities.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the leading types of fatal cancer worldwide

  • Another classification was proposed by Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG), who divided gastric cancers (GC) into subtypes linked to distinct patterns of molecular alterations, disease progression and prognosis [54]

  • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive GCs were observed in 5% of the diagnosed cases and they were associated with better survival and membranous expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the leading types of fatal cancer worldwide. Another meta-analysis indicates that gastric cancer with MSI is associated with better overall survival as compared with MSS [49].The different proportion of cardia/non-cardia tumors and differences in histological types could explain inconclusive results regarding the prognostic and predictive role of MSI in different studies. Recent studies have shown a correlation between molecular and clinico-pathological characteristics of GCs. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Group (TCGA) proposed a molecular classification dividing GC into four subtypes: EBV-positive tumors, microsatellite unstable tumors (MSI), genomically stable tumors (GS) and tumors with chromosomal instability (CIN) [42].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call