Abstract

Chronic inflammation is essential mechanism during the development of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The outcome of diseases depends on the balance between the migration/accumulation of pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages in damaged tissue. The mechanism of macrophage migration and subsequent accumulation is still not fully understood. Currently, the amoeboid adhesion-independent motility is considered essential for leukocyte migration in the three-dimensional environment. We challenge this hypothesis by studying the contribution of leukocyte adhesive receptors, integrins αMβ2, and αDβ2, to three-dimensional migration of M1-polarized, M2-polarized, and resident macrophages. Both integrins have a moderate expression on M2 macrophages, while αDβ2 is upregulated on M1 and αMβ2 demonstrates high expression on resident macrophages. The level of integrin expression determines its contribution to macrophage migration. Namely, intermediate expression supports macrophage migration, while a high integrin density inhibits it. Using in vitro three-dimensional migration and in vivo tracking of adoptively-transferred fluorescently-labeled macrophages during the resolution of inflammation, we found that strong adhesion of M1-activated macrophages translates to weak 3D migration, while moderate adhesion of M2-activated macrophages generates dynamic motility. Reduced migration of M1 macrophages depends on the high expression of αDβ2, since αD-deficiency decreased M1 macrophage adhesion and improved migration in fibrin matrix and peritoneal tissue. Similarly, the high expression of αMβ2 on resident macrophages prevents their amoeboid migration, which is markedly increased in αM-deficient macrophages. In contrast, αD- and αM-knockouts decrease the migration of M2 macrophages, demonstrating that moderate integrin expression supports cell motility. The results were confirmed in a diet-induced diabetes model. αD deficiency prevents the retention of inflammatory macrophages in adipose tissue and improves metabolic parameters, while αM deficiency does not affect macrophage accumulation. Summarizing, β2 integrin-mediated adhesion may inhibit amoeboid and mesenchymal macrophage migration or support mesenchymal migration in tissue, and, therefore, represents an important target to control inflammation.

Highlights

  • Monocyte/macrophage migration to, and accumulation within the site of inflammation are critical steps in the development of the inflammatory response

  • Labeled M1 and M2 macrophages were mixed in an equal number (Supplementary Figure 1A) and placed on a 3 dimensional (3D) fibrin gel where cell migration was stimulated via a Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) gradient (Figures 1C,E)

  • It has been shown previously that M1 and M2 macrophages demonstrate a similar chemotaxis to MCP-1 in 2 dimensional (2D) transwell assay [27]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monocyte/macrophage migration to, and accumulation within the site of inflammation are critical steps in the development of the inflammatory response. While acute inflammation is usually generated as a defensive mechanism, the development of chronic inflammation is an essential step in the initiation or progression of many devastating diseases including atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, arthritis and others [1,2,3,4]. Macrophage accumulation at the damaged tissue is a hallmark of inflammation [5, 6]. The particular subset of accumulated macrophages is critical for the further development or resolution of chronic inflammation. The balance between the accumulation of pro-inflammatory and antiinflammatory macrophages regulates the fate of inflammation. The mechanism of macrophage accumulation is not fully understood

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call