Abstract

Influenza virus infection in pigs is a major farming problem, causing considerable economic loss and posing a zoonotic threat. In addition the pig is an excellent model for understanding immunity to influenza viruses as this is a natural host pathogen system. Experimentally, influenza virus is delivered to pigs intra-nasally, by intra-tracheal instillation or by aerosol, but there is little data comparing the outcome of different methods. We evaluated the shedding pattern, cytokine responses in nasal swabs and immune responses following delivery of low or high dose swine influenza pdmH1N1 virus to the respiratory tract of pigs intra-nasally or by aerosol and compared them to those induced in naturally infected contact pigs. Our data shows that natural infection by contact induces remarkably high innate and adaptive immune response, although the animals were exposed to a very low virus dose. In contacts, the kinetics of virus shedding were slow and prolonged and more similar to the low dose directly infected animals. In contrast the cytokine profile in nasal swabs, antibody and cellular immune responses of contacts more closely resemble immune responses in high dose directly inoculated animals. Consideration of these differences is important for studies of disease pathogenesis and assessment of vaccine protective efficacy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0390-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Influenza A virus (IAV) is an important zoonotic pathogen that can cause substantial mortality and rapidly disseminate through economically important avian and mammalian populations [1,2,3]

  • In order to determine the most relevant model for assessment of IAV pathogenesis, transmission, vaccine efficacy or therapeutic intervention, we examined whether experimental delivery of swine influenza virus (SwIV) to the upper respiratory tract (URT) or lower respiratory tract (LRT) intra-nasally or by aerosol respectively, best represents natural infection

  • Kinetics of virus shedding following aerosol, intranasal and contact infection with influenza virus To determine the role of dose and route of infection on virus shedding and immune responses, pigs were infected with A/Sw/Eng/1353/09 influenza virus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Influenza A virus (IAV) is an important zoonotic pathogen that can cause substantial mortality and rapidly disseminate through economically important avian (ducks and chickens) and mammalian (human, swine and other) populations [1,2,3]. Because human origin viruses or viruses containing human origin gene segments frequently adapt to transmit efficiently in pigs [4, 5] the pig is a source of new viruses. As both pigs and humans are readily infected with IAVs of similar subtype, the pig is a robust and appropriate model for investigating both swine and human disease. The porcine lung resembles the human in terms of its tracheobronchial tree structure, lung physiology, morphology and distribution of receptors bound by influenza A viruses [3, 7]. Studies of the infection dynamics of pandemic (pdm) A/(H1N1) origin viruses in pigs may throw light on factors affecting transmission and infection in humans

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call