Abstract

Higher species commonly learn novel behaviors by evaluating retrospectively whether actions have yielded desirable outcomes. By relying on explicit behavioral instructions, only humans can use an acquisition shortcut that prospectively specifies how to yield intended outcomes under the appropriate stimulus conditions. A recent and largely unexplored hypothesis suggests that striatal areas interact with lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) when novel behaviors are learned via explicit instruction, and that regional subspecialization exists for the integration of differential response–outcome contingencies into the current task model. Behaviorally, outcome integration during instruction-based learning has been linked to functionally distinct performance indices. This includes (1) compatibility effects, measured in a postlearning test procedure probing the encoding strength of outcome–response (O–R) associations, and (2) increasing response slowing across learning, putatively indicating active usage of O–R associations for the online control of goal-directed action. In the present fMRI study, we examined correlations between these behavioral indices and the dynamics of fronto-striatal couplings in order to mutually constrain and refine the interpretation of neural and behavioral measures in terms of separable subprocesses during outcome integration. We found that O–R encoding strength correlated with LPFC–putamen coupling, suggesting that the putamen is relevant for the formation of both S–R habits and habit-like O–R associations. By contrast, response slowing as a putative index of active usage of O–R associations correlated with LPFC–caudate coupling. This finding highlights the relevance of the caudate for the online control of goal-directed action also under instruction-based learning conditions, and in turn clarifies the functional relevance of the behavioral slowing effect.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0325-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Higher animals, including humans, commonly learn novel behaviors via trial and error, by evaluating retrospectively whether an action performed under certain stimulus conditions yielded desirable outcomes

  • This was followed by a slight response times (RTs) increase at SRO-Rep4, indicating the transition into the unguided phase, in which responses had to be selected on the basis of memorized S–R association from the preceding guided learning phase

  • Our results suggest that fronto-striatal couplings enable the learning of novel goal-directed actions via an internal model of response–outcome contingencies buffered in lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) (LPFC) “procedural working memory”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Higher animals, including humans, commonly learn novel behaviors via trial and error, by evaluating retrospectively whether an action performed under certain stimulus conditions yielded desirable outcomes. One might expect that both areas engage interactively when learning and behavior is “modelbased” rather than “model-free” in the sense that it is driven by explicit knowledge of contingencies stored in lateral PFC (LPFC) working memory (cf Dolan & Dayan, 2013; Glascher, Daw, Dayan, & O’Doherty, 2010) This view has recently been expressed in a few formal models on instruction-based control of learning and behavior (Doll et al, 2009; Huang, Hazy, Herd, & O’Reilly, 2013; Ramamoorthy & Verguts, 2012). Thereby, we were able to obtain a relatively pure measure of O–R association strength

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.