Abstract
Interest groups for medical students (MSs) facilitate interest and engagement in neurosurgery. Students without interest groups are at a disadvantage as a result of greater barriers to exposure. We aimed to compare the usefulness of a virtual neurosurgery training camp for MSs with and without interest groups. A survey assessing demographics, interests, and ratings of informativeness and usefulness was sent to attendees of virtual neurosurgery training camps. Ratings were quantified on modified 7-point Likert scales. Data were compared between respondents with and without neurosurgery interest groups. Students without an interest group were less likely to be MS1/MS2 (P= 0.0007) and more likely to be postdoctoral students (P= 0.0017). Students without an interest group were less likely to list breakout sessions as their primary reason for attendance (P= 0.0007), more likely to rate the resident panel as most useful (P= 0.0429), and less likely to rate the breakout session as most useful (P=0.0231). Students without interest groups reported greater increases in interest in neurosurgery in general (P=0.0284) and subspecialties of spine (P= 0.0003), peripheral nerve (P= 0.0054), and pediatric (P= 0.0137). There was no difference in willingness to pursue a neurosurgical career (P= 0.06), likelihood of taking a year off during medical school (P= 0.45), or preparedness for subinternships (P= 0.18) or residency application process (P= 0.43). Distance learning increases both general and subspecialty-specific interest in neurosurgery among MSs without neurosurgery interest groups to a greater degree than among those with interest groups. Future initiatives seeking to benefit students without home programs should address the specific concerns of these students.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have