Distal radius fracture fixation using volar plate: A comparative study evaluating the biomechanical behavior of uni and bicortical distal screws

Abstract

Extensor tendon ruptures caused by bicortical screws impingement following distal radius fracture fixation with volar plates are extensively reported in the literature. Thus, a biomechanical study comparing unicortical and bicortical fixations in intra-articular distal radius fracture models is critical in decision-making regarding distal radius fracture management. Forty-two synthetic radius models were fixed using a variable angle volar distal locking plate with seven screws. They were divided into 6 groups (n = 7): G1/G3/G4 unicortical fixation (75% of anteroposterior distal radius lenght); G2/G4/G6 bicortical fixation. Each group underwent a different mechanical test: axial compression (G1/G2), dorsal flexion (G3/G4), and volar flexion (G5/G6). The load application rate was 5 mm/min and 1000 cycles of 50 to 250 N at 1 Hz were performed between both static tests. Comparative results in the first static test, in the second static test, and in failure generally showed a very similar behavior. Models depicted similar behavior in the second static test when cyclic load was performed. Therefore, one can realize that stiffness differed during dorsal flexion only in the first static test. Maximum force to break the model in axial compression was greater in bicortical than in unicortical construct. Since biomechanical properties are similar, we recommend using unicortical distal locking screws in distal radius fracture fixation with volar plates to prevent extensor tendon ruptures.