Abstract

While it has been recently recognized that freshwater ecosystems may significantly offset the terrestrial carbon sink through emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), empirical data on the magnitude of these sources are still scarce, in particular in temperate regions. In this study, we measured the near-surface dissolved concentrations of CH4 and CO2 from 40 lakes in the Alpine area to estimate their potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We hypothesized (1) a temperature-driven gradient of dissolved gas concentrations in terms of elevation and latitude of the lakes and (2) that lower concentrations would be measured in man-made reservoirs compared to natural lakes. Average CH4 and CO2 surface dissolved concentrations amounted to 1.10 ± 1.30 and 36.23 ± 31.15 µmol L−1, respectively. All the lakes, except for one, were supersaturated, exceeding ambient atmospheric CH4 and CO2 concentrations by a factor of 400 ± 424 and 2.43 ± 2.29, respectively. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found lower surface dissolved GHG concentrations in man-made reservoirs compared to natural lakes, which was shown to be related to their greater depth. Even though temperature is known to affect multiple physico-chemical and biological processes governing the strength of the uptake, release and conversion of CH4 and CO2, and temperature is inversely related to elevation, no relationship between dissolved GHG concentrations and elevation could be determined. This is believed to be the result of the overriding importance of lake depth for near-surface CH4 concentrations and the lack of explanatory variables related to lake carbon cycling. Overall, this study suggests that lakes in the Alpine region act as sources of CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere and that further research should be carried out to quantify the actual GHG emissions from Alpine freshwater bodies and how these are affected by ongoing changes in climate and land use.

Highlights

  • Carbon dioxide ­(CO2) and methane ­(CH4) are the most studied greenhouse gases (GHG) due to their global warming potential and their recent concentration increase in the atmosphere (Ciais et al 2013)

  • Bastviken et al (2011) were able to establish a global estimation of C­ H4 emissions, where 61.2% were emitted as ebullition, 11% as diffusive fluxes, and the remaining 27.8% was stored in the systems

  • The near-surface waters of all lakes, except for one (Schlegeis Speicher, a reservoir) where no methane could be measured, were supersaturated with both C­ H4 and ­CO2, i.e. their dissolved concentrations were higher compared to the atmospheric concentration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carbon dioxide ­(CO2) and methane ­(CH4) are the most studied greenhouse gases (GHG) due to their global warming potential and their recent concentration increase in the atmosphere (Ciais et al 2013). Inland waters (lakes, rivers, and reservoirs) were not integrated into the carbon budget. A re-evaluation of the surface area of lakes (Downing et al 2006), reservoirs and small ponds showed that these inland waters cover more than 3% of Earth’s surface, which is twice as high as previous estimates. Tranvik et al (2009) re-estimated the “active pipes” from Cole et al (2007) and evaluated that about 48.3% of this carbon is released to the atmosphere as ­CO2, whereas 20.7% is buried in the sediments, mainly by lakes, reservoirs and wetlands and the remaining 31% is directed towards the oceans by rivers and ground waters. 32 Page 2 of 13 carbon as the ocean making them “pipes” transporting carbon from land to oceans, and “reactors”, transforming terrestrial (allochthonous) carbon. Tranvik et al (2009) re-estimated the “active pipes” from Cole et al (2007) and evaluated that about 48.3% of this carbon is released to the atmosphere as ­CO2, whereas 20.7% is buried in the sediments, mainly by lakes, reservoirs and wetlands and the remaining 31% is directed towards the oceans by rivers and ground waters. Bastviken et al (2011) were able to establish a global estimation of C­ H4 emissions, where 61.2% were emitted as ebullition, 11% as diffusive fluxes, and the remaining 27.8% was stored in the systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call