Abstract

Aluminum can effectively be debased by the addition of a small amount of indium or tin.This paper describes the experimental results for anodic dissolution of high-purity Al-In binary alloys in chloride solutions.At first, cast alloys having various indium contents were galvanostatically electrolyzed for 300 hrs. in synthetic sea water at a constant anode current density of 1 mA/cm2. Anode potential of 0.1% In alloy was constant at-1.1V (SCE) and its anode efficiency was found to be about 90%.Secondly, alloys, containing 0.010.2% In, were cold rolled to 90% reduction and subjected to solution heat-treatment at temperatures of 470620°C. subsequently, they were galvanostatically electrolyzed at a constant current density of 1 mA/cm2 for 1 hr. in 1M-NaCl (pH = 5.5) at 25°C. Stationary anode potential was measured and after anodic dissolution for 1 hr., dissolution morphology of alloys was examined.The dissolution was pitting and anodic behavior of alloys was found to be classified into two groups.Anode potential of alloys, solution-treated at temperatures lower than 500°C, was slightly less noble than that of 99.99% Al (-0.7V, SC E). While, alloys, containing more than 0.06% In and quenched from above 500°C, showed less noble anode potential of -1.1V.The shape of pits produced on pure aluminum was a rugged polyhedron having facets of {100} planes. The pit morphology of thin foils was examined under a transmission electron microscope and it was found that the process of pit growth was tunneling, by which (100) plane as an active front proceeded in [100] direction. Such a crystallographic growth of pits by tunneling was more remarkable in alloys showing dissolution at a potential more noble than -w0.9 V (A-type dissolution). Facets of the pits developed on the alloys, dissolved at less noble potential of -1.1 V (B-type dissolution), included {111} and other planes as well as {100} planes.Anodic behavior of the alloy having air-formed film was compared with that of the alloy treated in pure water at 30°C for 72 hrs. and very little difference was found in pitting behavior in the chloride solution between the both.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.