Abstract

Target detection performance is known to be influenced by events in the previous trials. It has not been clear, however, whether this bias effect is due to the previous sensory stimulus, motor response, or decision. Also it remains open whether or not the previous trial effect emerges via the same mechanism as the effect of knowledge about the target probability. In the present study, we asked normal human subjects to make a decision about the presence or absence of a visual target. We presented a pre-cue indicating the target probability before the stimulus, and also a decision-response mapping cue after the stimulus so as to tease apart the effect of decision from that of motor response. We found that the target detection performance was significantly affected by the probability cue in the current trial and also by the decision in the previous trial. While the information about the target probability modulated the decision criteria, the previous decision modulated the sensitivity to target-relevant sensory signals (d-prime). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we also found that activation in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was decreased when the probability cue indicated a high probability of the target. By contrast, activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was increased when the subjects made a target-present decision in the previous trial, but this change was observed specifically when the target was present in the current trial. Activation in these regions was associated with individual-difference in the decision computation parameters. We argue that the previous decision biases the target detection performance by modulating the processing of target-selective information, and this mechanism is distinct from modulation of decision criteria due to expectation of a target.

Highlights

  • Our decision about a sensory stimulus is known to be biased by the probabilistic information about the stimulus

  • We found that removal of either prev-Cue or prevTarget factor did not significantly decrease the fitting of the model, indicating that these factors do not contribute to the detection performance

  • We have compared the effect of prior information about target probability and that of previous trial on a visual detection performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our decision about a sensory stimulus is known to be biased by the probabilistic information about the stimulus. The expectation or knowledge about the likelihood of a given stimulus is shown to bias the decision performance through modulation of the distance to a decision criteria (Carpenter and Williams, 1995; Domenech and Dreher, 2010; Forstmann et al, 2010; Rahnev et al, 2011; Turner et al, 2011; Mulder et al, 2012; Rao et al, 2012; Wyart et al, 2012). There are studies suggesting that the previous choice affects the processing of sensory information (Treisman and Williams, 1984; Fecteau et al, 2004; Liston and Stone, 2008), and it remains open whether or not the previous choice effect is mediated by the same mechanism as the effect of knowledge about the target probability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.