Abstract

Retrosplenial cortex (RSC) plays a role in using environmental landmarks to help orientate oneself in space. It has also been consistently implicated in processing landmarks that remain fixed in a permanent location. However, it is not clear whether the RSC represents the permanent landmarks themselves or instead the orienting relevance of these landmarks. In previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, these features have been conflated—stable landmarks were always useful for orienting. Here, we dissociated these two key landmark attributes to investigate which one best reflects the function of the RSC. Before scanning, participants learned the features of novel landmarks about which they had no prior knowledge. During fMRI scanning, we found that the RSC was more engaged when people viewed permanent compared with transient landmarks and was not responsive to the orienting relevance of landmarks. Activity in RSC was also related to the amount of landmark permanence information a person had acquired and, as knowledge increased, the more the RSC drove responses in the anterior thalamus while viewing permanent landmarks. In contrast, the angular gyrus and the hippocampus were engaged by the orienting relevance of landmarks, but not their permanence, with the hippocampus also sensitive to the distance between relevant landmarks and target locations. We conclude that the coding of permanent landmarks in RSC may drive processing in regions like anterior thalamus, with possible implications for the efficacy of functions such as navigation.

Highlights

  • Landmarks are an essential component of our spatial representations of the environment (Burnett, Smith, & May, 2001; Siegel & White, 1975; Lynch, 1960)

  • Auger et al (2012) showed that self-declared good navigators were more consistent than poor navigators at identifying the most permanent landmarks and had increased engagement of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and the anterior thalamus (AThal), a region heavily connected with the RSC ( Jankowski et al, 2013; Vann, Aggleton, & Maguire, 2009), when viewing those items

  • For any landmark features to which RSC was responsive in the whole-brain univariate analyses, we investigated its interactions with other brain areas and how these interactions varied depending on how well participants had learned that feature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landmarks are an essential component of our spatial representations of the environment (Burnett, Smith, & May, 2001; Siegel & White, 1975; Lynch, 1960). It has been possible to decode how many permanent landmarks were in view from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in the RSC, but not from other brain areas (Auger & Maguire, 2013). This shows that the RSC was not engaged by the presence of permanence per se but was mechanistically more nuanced, tracking the specific number of permanent items

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call