Abstract

Wildlife trafficking poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Species such as pangolins are particularly vulnerable and trade continues almost unabated despite numerous interventions aimed at eradicating illegal wildlife trade. Despite restrictions on the pangolin trade, thousands of pangolins continue to be intercepted annually. We focused on China because of the recent delisting of pangolins from the Chinese pharmacopeia, and their removal from healthcare insurance, despite deeply ingrained traditions of having pangolins for ethno-medicinal use. We collated pangolin interception data from public online media seizure reports to characterize the pangolin trade within China, and found that a total of 326 independent seizures equivalent to 143,130 pangolins (31,676 individuals and 222,908 kg of scale) were reported in 26 provinces. Pangolin domestic seizures are greatest in the southern cities of Dehong, Fangchenggang, and Guangzhou. Also, we found 17 countries within the global pangolins range which were the major source of the pangolin shipments to China. The number of arrests and convictions was much lower than the number of pangolin incidents reported. Our results show a significant increase in the volume of scales and number of live pangolin seizures after amended endangered species law came into effect in 2018, and recorded the highest number of individual pangolin interceptions. China has shown increasing wildlife seizures over time, owing partly to emergent trends in the international wildlife trade as well as increasing global demand for ethnomedicine. The future eradication of illegal wildlife trade in China is dependent not only on stringent border control and offender prosecution but also the; removal of other threatened species from the pharmacopeia and healthcare insurance which includes wildlife derivatives. Furthermore, our work highlights importance of current policy intervention to combat the pangolin trade within China, and the need for further interventions both within China and in export countries.

Highlights

  • The illegal wildlife trade is a multibillion-dollar enterprise, the fourth-largest illegal trade, exceeded only by narcotics, human trafficking, and arms smuggling

  • Our findings show that the illegal pangolins trade is disproportionally domiciled in Guangdong, Guangxi and Yunnan provinces

  • Overall, regarding the illegal trade in pangolins, there has been an increased in the quantity intercepted but a decrease in the number of incidents analyzed over time, and it is fair to assume that smugglers are changing the mode of their illicit trade

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The illegal wildlife trade is a multibillion-dollar enterprise, the fourth-largest illegal trade, exceeded only by narcotics, human trafficking, and arms smuggling. All eight pangolin species are threatened and listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), due to continued demand for their meat and body parts (scales) in ethnomedicine use (CITES 2016; UNODC 2016). This provides pangolins with the highest protection through CITES and prohibits international trade in wild-caught pangolins for commercial purposes worldwide (CITES 2016). China and the United States of America (USA) were identified as the most common destinations for international pangolin (scale and body parts) trafficking (Heinrich et al 2017; Shairp et al 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call