Abstract
The idiosyncratic volatility anomaly, as first documented in Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang (2006), has received considerable attention in the literature. In this paper, we examine the pervasiveness of the anomaly in various stock samples and provide evidence towards distinguishing potential explanations. Our results show that the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly is a common stock phenomenon. It is rather robust once we exclude microcaps, as defined in Fama and French (2008), or penny stocks (with prices below $5), or the month of January, corroborating the findings in Doran, Jiang, and Peterson (2010). In addition, we show that the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly is not due to the market microstructure effect and cannot be explained by short-term stock return reversal.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
