Abstract

A robust 3-D GPR dataset provides interpreters with a variety of methods for extracting important information at buried archaeological sites. An iterative approach that uses reflection profile analysis, amplitude slice-mapping, and often both in conjunction is often necessary as neither method by itself is sufficient. In northern Australia, two constructed mounds contain a number of cultural and geological horizons and features, which can be imaged with GPR. The reflection profiles display the modified ground surface prior to mound construction and some initial construction layers. On the pre-mound surface, amplitude maps of reflective layers that were built-up on the ground surface indicate that they were constructed in an intentional manner. Those surfaces were later covered by sand to produce mounds used for human burial. Human internments in the mound can only be seen in reflection profiles, but once discovered, the profiles can be re-sliced to produce high definition amplitude images of these remains. No one method of analysis can provide an overall interpretation of these complex internal mound features. When the methods are varied, depending on the results of one method, a detailed and varied analysis of certain aspects of the mounds’ internal features are visible, leading to the generation of a number of hypotheses about how this area of northern Australia was used in the past. The 3-D data from GPR shows that this area was an important location on the landscape in the past, and was modified by the construction of a monumental mound, which was then used for human burials, and more recently, the construction of what was likely a ritual enclosure.

Highlights

  • The ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method has a unique ability to record reflections of electromagnetic waves in the near-surface within 3-D volumes of ground [1]

  • When reflection profiles are closely spaced within a grid, hundreds of thousands of individual reflections can be recorded in a small area, leading to a dizzying array of information, which can often overwhelm an interpreter

  • The case has been made that there are a variety of data forms that can provide important information from the ground, which are being overlooked in modern interpretative approaches [5,6,7]. Those include an analysis of individual reflection traces, reflection profile analysis, and data processing specific to individual site parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method has a unique ability to record reflections of electromagnetic waves in the near-surface within 3-D volumes of ground [1]. The case has been made that there are a variety of data forms that can provide important information from the ground, which are being overlooked in modern interpretative approaches [5,6,7] Those include an analysis of individual reflection traces, reflection profile analysis, and data processing specific to individual site parameters. In this study, depending on the size of the buried features, their depth and the stratigraphy within the mounds, reflection profile analysis in detailed small areas, large-scale amplitude mapping, and high resolution amplitude analysis with associated profile interpretation were used The complexity of these mounds necessitated all these approaches, and certain methods were chosen for specific buried features, depending on where they sit in the mound and how they are associated with the internal mound layering. The units’ extent and the shape of the fill units were determined by creating amplitude maps directly along the units of importance, which was only possible after they had been identified, corrected for topography, and understood using profile analysis

The Site in Northern Australia
GPR Data
Analysis
Analysis of Amplitude for Shallow
Reflection profile showing
Reflection
Integration
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call