Abstract

Many species employ camouflage to disguise their true shape and avoid detection or recognition. Disruptive coloration is a form of camouflage in which high-contrast patterns obscure internal features or break up an animal's outline. In particular, edge enhancement creates illusory, or ‘fake’ depth edges within the animal's body. Disruptive coloration often co-occurs with background matching, and together, these strategies make it difficult for an observer to visually segment an animal from its background. However, stereoscopic vision could provide a critical advantage in the arms race between perception and camouflage: the depth information provided by binocular disparities reveals the true three-dimensional layout of a scene, and might, therefore, help an observer to overcome the effects of disruptive coloration. Human observers located snake targets embedded in leafy backgrounds. We analysed performance (response time) as a function of edge enhancement, illumination conditions and the availability of binocular depth cues. We confirm that edge enhancement contributes to effective camouflage: observers were slower to find snakes whose patterning contains ‘fake’ depth edges. Importantly, however, this effect disappeared when binocular depth cues were available. Illumination also affected detection: under directional illumination, where both the leaves and snake produced strong cast shadows, snake targets were localized more quickly than in scenes rendered under ambient illumination. In summary, we show that illusory depth edges, created via disruptive coloration, help to conceal targets from human observers. However, cast shadows and binocular depth information improve detection by providing information about the true three-dimensional structure of a scene. Importantly, the strong interaction between disparity and edge enhancement suggests that stereoscopic vision has a critical role in breaking camouflage, enabling the observer to overcome the disruptive effects of edge enhancement.

Highlights

  • Many animals, such as the copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix, figure 1a), use camouflage to avoid detection or recognition

  • These observations are supported by statistical analyses: edge enhancement increased response time (RT) and binocular depth information reduced reaction times but these two factors strongly interacted: (F1,28 1⁄4 25.23, p, 0.001, h2G 1⁄4 0:03)

  • Edge enhancement appears to work by mimicking the visual signals that, within the natural environment, signify the presence of object boundaries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many animals, such as the copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix, figure 1a), use camouflage to avoid detection or recognition. Background matching and edge enhancement can be thought of as complementary camouflage strategies: the former disguises the true boundaries of an animal, whereas the latter provides misleading segmentation cues (i.e. fake bounding contours) within the animal’s body. Together, these strategies conceal the true bounding contour of a predator or prey to impede segmentation, detection and recognition. Countershaded animals including deer, goats, caterpillars and sharks are darker on their dorsal, illumination-facing surfaces and brighter on their undersides This pattern of pigmentation counteracts the shading induced by overhead illumination and could improve the animal’s background matching and/ or make their three-dimensional shape harder to discern [2,3,30]. We hypothesize that: (i) the presence of edge enhancement will disrupt target localization; (ii) this disruptive effect of edge enhancement may be reduced under stereoscopic viewing; (iii) search may facilitated by the cast shadows available under direct illumination; and (iv) edge enhancement may be more effective under direct illumination

Methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call