Abstract
Attention can be involuntarily biased toward reward-associated distractors (value-driven attentional capture, VDAC). Yet past work has primarily demonstrated this distraction phenomenon during a particular set of circumstances: transient attentional orienting to potentially relevant stimuli occurring in our visual environment. Consequently, it is not well-understood if reward-based attentional capture can occur under other circumstances, such as during sustained visuospatial attention. Using EEG, we investigated whether associating transient distractors with reward value would increase their distractibility and lead to greater decrements in concurrent sustained spatial attention directed elsewhere. Human participants learned to associate three differently colored, laterally presented squares with rewards of varying magnitude (zero, small, and large). These colored squares were then periodically reintroduced as distractors at the same lateral locations during a demanding sustained-attention rapid-serial-visual-presentation (RSVP) task at the midline. Behavioral and neural evidence indicated that participants had successfully learned and maintained the reward associations to the distractors. During the RSVP task, consistent with prior work, we found that the distractors generated dips in the instantaneous amplitude of the steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by the midline RSVP stimuli, indicating that the distractors were indeed transiently disrupting sustained spatial attention. Contrary to our hypotheses, however, the magnitude of this dip did not differ by the magnitude of the distractor’s reward associations. These results indicate that while sustained spatial attention can be impaired by the introduction of distractors at another location, the main distraction process is resistant to the distractors’ reward associations, thus providing evidence of an important boundary condition to value-driven attentional capture.
Highlights
A burgeoning body of work has documented how attention can be involuntarily drawn to reward-associated stimuli – a phenomenon known as value-driven attentional capture (VDAC; Anderson et al, 2011b; Chelazzi et al, 2013; Failing and Theeuwes, 2018)
The physical introduction of a transient distractor did decrease sustained spatial attention, as reflected by a dip in the state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) response elicited by the RSVP task, this disruption was not significantly affected by the distractors’ reward associations
This indicates that the reward associations of the distractor stimuli did not have a significant effect on sustained spatial attention beyond the distraction associated with the physical introduction of a new and irrelevant stimulus
Summary
A burgeoning body of work has documented how attention can be involuntarily drawn to reward-associated stimuli – a phenomenon known as value-driven attentional capture (VDAC; Anderson et al, 2011b; Chelazzi et al, 2013; Failing and Theeuwes, 2018). This research collectively suggests that VDAC may be a ubiquitous phenomenon that broadly affects many aspects of attentional orienting and behavior – similar to what has been previously reported for attentional capture to physical salience (Hickey et al, 2010). These parallels have generated considerable debate as to whether VDAC modulates the neural mechanisms of attention to other forms of attentional capture (Awh et al, 2012; Anderson, 2019; Bachman et al, 2020)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.