Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effect of visual disruption on submaximal force steadiness and accuracy among three groups including chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients, lateral ankle sprain copers, and healthy controls. Twentypatients with CAI, 20 copers, and 20 matched-healthy controls volunteered to participate in the study. Submaximal force steadiness and accuracy for evertors, invertors, and hip abductors (10% and 20% of their maximal voluntary isometric contraction) were measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. All groups performed the tasks with and without stroboscopic glasses. The CAI group showed worse steadiness and accuracy in evertors with visual disruption compared to nonvisual disruption (p < 0.0001 and = 0.02, respectively). Relative to the control group, the CAI group showed worse force steadiness and accuracy in evertors (p < 0.0001, both), worse force accuracy in hip abductors (p = 0.02), and the coper group also showed worse accuracy in evertors (p = 0.02). Individuals with CAI demonstrated impaired force steadiness and accuracy in evertors and hip abductors compared to healthy controls. In addition, they tended to rely more on visual feedback during the force steadiness task than copers and healthy controls.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call