Abstract
We have used the Cambridge Protein Trap resource (CPTI) to screen for flies whose locomotor rhythms are rhythmic in constant light (LL) as a means of identifying circadian photoreception genes. From the screen of ∼150 CPTI lines, we obtained seven hits, two of which targeted the glutamate pathway, Got1 (Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 1) and Gs2 (Glutamine synthetase 2). We focused on these by employing available mutants and observed that variants of these genes also showed high levels of LL rhythmicity compared with controls. It was also clear that the genetic background was important with a strong interaction observed with the common and naturally occurring timeless (tim) polymorphisms, ls-tim and s-tim. The less circadian photosensitive ls-tim allele generated high levels of LL rhythmicity in combination with Got1 or Gs2, even though ls-tim and s-tim alleles do not, by themselves, generate the LL phenotype. The use of dsRNAi for both genes as well as for Gad (Glutamic acid decarboxylase) and the metabotropic glutamate receptor DmGluRA driven by clock gene promoters also revealed high levels of LL rhythmicity compared to controls. It is clear that the glutamate pathway is heavily implicated in circadian photoreception. TIM levels in Got1 and Gs2 mutants cycled and were more abundant than in controls under LL. Got1 but not Gs2 mutants showed diminished phase shifts to 10 min light pulses. Neurogenetic dissection of the LL rhythmic phenotype using the gal4/gal80 UAS bipartite system suggested that the more dorsal CRY-negative clock neurons, DNs and LNds were responsible for the LL phenotype. Immunocytochemistry using the CPTI YFP tagged insertions for the two genes revealed that the DN1s but not the DN2 and DN3s expressed Got1 and Gs2, but expression was also observed in the lateral neurons, the LNds and s-LNvs. Expression of both genes was also found in neuroglia. However, downregulation of glial Gs2 and Got1 using repo-gal4 did not generate high levels of LL rhythmicity, so it is unlikely that this phenotype is mediated by glial expression. Our results suggest a model whereby the DN1s and possibly CRY-negative LNds use glutamate signaling to supress the pacemaker s-LNvs in LL.
Highlights
The molecular basis of the Drosophila circadian clock has been dissected predominantly by the use of mutant screens (Axelrod et al, 2015)
Under constant light (LL), wild-type flies become behaviorally arrhythmic but cryb and cry0 mutants maintain rhythmic locomotor cycles (Emery et al, 2000; Dolezelova et al, 2007). These results suggest that CRY plays a role as the dedicated circadian photoreceptor under these conditions, and as the light gateway into the pacemaker(s) that determine rhythmic behavior, with the mutation apparently blocking all light input including that from the rhodopsins
Each CPT line was tested in constant darkness (DD) and all were rhythmic the line CPTI00051 in which the insertion lies in the Rab11 locus showed a significantly longer free-running period in DD (26.0 ± 0.3 h)
Summary
The molecular basis of the Drosophila circadian clock has been dissected predominantly by the use of mutant screens (Axelrod et al, 2015). This forward genetics approach has identified a number of cardinal clock genes that generate interconnected feedback loops, in which two transcription factors, CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC), play centre stage by dimerizing and activating transcription of period (per) and timeless (tim) during the subjective day (Hardin and Panda, 2013). During the subjective day, PER and TIM are degraded which releases CLK/CYC to return to the per/tim promoters and re-activate transcription. CLK intersects with two other loops defined by PDP1ε/VRI and CWO which stabilize the oscillating system (Hardin and Panda, 2013)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.