Abstract
Disputes about what to do with unused, cryopreserved, pre‐implantation, pre‐embryos (“frozen embryos”) in family law cases have been making headlines for nearly 30 years. At least 15 cases have been decided by courts of appeal across the U.S., and the result of these decisions is uncertainty. Cases have been decided primarily based on three different approaches: the contract approach; the balancing of interests approach; and the contemporaneous mutual consent approach. There is great reluctance to decide any case in a manner that will compel parenthood against a person's wishes. The article proposes that we adopt the approach of counsel or contemporaneous mutual consent.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
