Abstract

Several aspects of the management of displaced supracondylar fractures in children remain controversial. Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures (Type III) in children have traditionally been considered orthopaedic emergencies. Recent studies have suggested that closed Type III supracondylar fractures without vascular compromise may be treated in a delayed manner without compromise to functional and cosmetic outcome. Debate continues over the fixation method of choice in these difficult fractures. A postal questionnaire of 121 practising paediatric orthopaedic consultants in the UK was performed to explore these issues. Seventy-seven replies were obtained (63.6%). The 54.5% of the respondents managed displaced supracondylar fractures without vascular compromise in a delayed manner (more than 8 h from presentation). The incidence, initial assessment and factors which influence the timing of surgery of these fractures are discussed. The fixation method of choice reported was closed reduction and the use of smooth Kirshner wires (93.4%). Of these, crossed pin fixation is used by 83.9% of respondents and 9.7% employed laterally placed wires. The majority of consultants (69.7%) considered the operative treatment of these fractures a consultant-led procedure. This survey has established an overview of the current practices of paediatric orthopaedic consultants in the UK in the management of these difficult fractures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.