Abstract

CP violation (CPV) in $D^0-\overline{D^0}$ mixing is described in terms of the dispersive and absorptive `weak phases' $\phi_f^M$ and $\phi_f^\Gamma$. They parametrize CPV originating from the interference of $D^0$ decays with and without dispersive mixing, and with and without absorptive mixing, respectively, for CP conjugate hadronic final states $f$, $\bar f$. These are distinct and separately measurable effects. For CP eigenstate final states, indirect CPV only depends on $\phi_f^M$ (dispersive CPV), whereas $\phi_f^\Gamma$ (absorptive CPV) can only be probed with non-CP eigenstate final states. Measurements of the final state dependent phases $\phi_f^M$, $\phi_f^\Gamma$ determine the intrinsic dispersive and absorptive mixing phases $\phi_2^M$ and $\phi_2^\Gamma$. The latter are the arguments of the dispersive and absorptive mixing amplitudes $M_{12}$ and $\Gamma_{12}$, relative to their dominant ($\Delta U=2$) $U$-spin components. The intrinsic phases are experimentally accessible due to approximate universality: in the SM, and in extensions with negligible new CPV phases in Cabibbo favored/doubly Cabibbo suppressed (CF/DCS) decays, the deviation of $\phi_f^{M,\Gamma}$ from $\phi_2^{M,\Gamma}$ is negligible in CF/DCS decays $D^0 \to K^\pm X$, and below $10\% $ in CF/DCS decays $D^0 \to K_{S,L} X$ (up to precisely known $O(\epsilon_K)$ corrections). In Singly Cabibbo Suppressed (SCS) decays, QCD pollution enters at $O(\epsilon)$ in $U$-spin breaking and can be significant, but is $O(\epsilon^2)$ in the average over $f=K^+K^-$, $\pi^+\pi^-$. SM estimates yield $\phi_2^M, \phi_2^\Gamma = O(0.2\%)$. A fit to current data allows $O(10)$ larger phases at $2\sigma$, from new physics. A fit based on naively extrapolated experimental precision suggests that sensitivity to $\phi_2^{M}$ and $\phi_2^{\Gamma}$ in the SM may be achieved at the LHCb Phase II upgrade.

Highlights

  • In the Standard Model (SM), CP violation (CPV) enters D0 − D 0 mixing and D decays at OðVcbVub=VcsVusÞ∼ 10−3, due to the weak phase γ

  • They are defined in terms of φλf and jq=pj as3 2Δxf 1⁄4 x cos φλf pq − pq þ y sin φλf pq þ pq ; 2Δyf 1⁄4 y cos φλf pq − pq − x sin φλf pq þ pq : The observable −Δyf is equivalent to the familiar CPVINT asymmetry ΔYf for singly Cabibbo suppressed (SCS) decays to CP eigenstate final states, cf. (59)

  • In this paper we have developed the description of CP violation in D0 − D 0 mixing in terms of the final state dependent dispersive and absorptive weak phases φMf and φΓf

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the Standard Model (SM), CP violation (CPV) enters D0 − D 0 mixing and D decays at OðVcbVub=VcsVusÞ∼ 10−3, due to the weak phase γ. In order to estimate the magnitudes and final state dependence of φMf ;Γ in the different classes of decays, we compare them to a theoretical pair of dispersive and absorptive phases The latter are intrinsic to the mixing amplitudes, and follow from their U-spin decomposition. Cabibbo suppressed decays (CF/DCS), the differences between φMf and φM2 , or φΓf and φΓ2 are essentially known This allows for precise experimental determinations of the theoretical phases, and their comparison with U-spin based estimates and future lattice measurements. A single pair of intrinsic dispersive and absorptive mixing phases suffices to parametrize all indirect CPV effects in CF/DCS decays, whereas for SCS decays this may cease to be the case as SM sensitivity is approached We refer to this fortunate state of affairs as approximate universality. The Appendix contains expressions for a selection of time-integrated CP asymmetries, demonstrating that they can be used to separately measure φM2 and φΓ2

Mixing and time evolution
The CPVINT observables
SCS decays to CP eigenstates
SCS decays to non-CP eigenstates
Relation to other parametrizations of CPVINT
A K 0X AK0X
Semileptonic decays
Hadronic decays
APPROXIMATE UNIVERSALITY
U-spin decomposition
CPV phases intrinsic to mixing
Final state dependence
A K 0 A K0
IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROXIMATE UNIVERSALITY
SCS decays
CURRENT STATUS AND PROJECTIONS
Superweak limit
Approximate universality fits
Findings
DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.