Abstract

There is significant interest in understanding whether nanomaterials with outstanding mechanical or electrical properties also possess antibacterial properties. However, assessment of antibacterial activity is a complex problem at the interface of chemistry and microbiology. Results can be affected by many factors including nanomaterial size, surface chemistry, concentration, and the dispersion media. The difficulty of dispersing nanomaterials such as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) has resulted in many studies being conducted in the presence of dispersion aides which may themselves contribute to bacterial stress. The recent discovery that a standard microbial growth media, tryptic soy broth (TSB), is an effective SWNT dispersant provides a new opportunity to investigate the potential antibacterial activity of SWNTs using dispersants that range from antibacterial to growth-supporting. The five dispersants chosen for this work were Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), pluronic, lysozyme, DNA, and tryptic soy broth. Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica were used as the model Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Activity was measured in terms of colony forming unit (CFU) and optical density measurements. None of the systems exhibited activity against Salmonella. SDS was fatal to Staph. aureus regardless of the presence of SWNTs. The activity of pluronic and lysozyme against Staph. aureus was enhanced by the presence of SWNTs. In contrast, the DNA and TSB dispersions did not have any activity regardless of the presence of SWNTs. These results highlight that the purported antibacterial activity of SWNTs may only be effective against bacteria that are sensitized by the dispersant and suggests the need for additional research on the mechanisms by which SWNT-dispersant interactions can result in antibacterial activity.

Highlights

  • Drug-resistant bacteria cause an estimated 700,000 deaths per year; this is predicted to rise to 10 million by 2050 [1]

  • colony forming unit (CFU) counts provide a way to rapidly assess activity by exploring the number of colony units after incubation with a material, while optical density measurements at 600 nm (OD600) can be used to evaluate the effects of a treatment on a growth curve

  • Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), which is included in many soaps, and lysozyme, which is used in some mouthwashes, are known to be active against Gram-positive bacteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drug-resistant bacteria cause an estimated 700,000 deaths per year; this is predicted to rise to 10 million by 2050 [1]. Assessing antibacterial activity is a complex task where the experimental protocol, type of bacteria, and details of nanomaterial size, surface chemistry, and dispersion media can all affect results. Dispersion in aqueous media can only be achieved by either oxidizing them to create carboxylic and hydroxyl groups on their surfaces or using dispersion aides that non-covalently adsorb on their sidewalls This dispersion challenge as well as their structural polydispersity has complicated efforts to assess whether they have antibacterial activity. The inclusion of dispersion aides in studies of pristine SWNTs introduces a confounding factor since many common SWNT dispersion aides such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), which is widely used in soap, are known to have antibacterial properties Both non-physiological media such as deionized water and dispersion aides such as SDS can stress bacteria and affect their growth. The results highlight the importance of considering synergistic interactions when assessing antibacterial activity

Results
SWNT Dispersion Preparations
SWNT Dispersion Chracterization
Bacterial Strains and Cultivation
Bacterial Culture Challenges and Viability Measurements
Statistical Analysis
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call