Abstract

Relying on silk can promote sharing, especially when its presence means life and its absence, quick death. In the case of Embioptera, they construct silken tubes and coverings exposed on tree bark in humid and warm environments or in leaf litter and underground in dry habitats. These coverings protect occupants from rain and natural enemies. Of note, adult females are neotenous, wingless and must walk to disperse. Evidence is pulled together from two sources to explore mechanisms that promote the establishment of non-kin groups that typify the neotropical Antipaluria urichi (Clothodidae): (1) a review of relevant information from 40 years of research to identify potential drivers of the facultative colonial system and (2) experimental and observational data exploring how dispersal contributes to group formation. To determine risks of dispersal and decisions of where to settle, adult females were released into the field and their ability to survive in the face of likely predation was monitored. Additional captured dispersers were released onto bark containing silk galleries; their decision to join the silk or to settle was noted. An experiment tested which attributes of trees attract a disperser: vertical or horizontal boles in one test and small, medium, or large boles in another. While walking, experimentally released adult female dispersers experienced a risk of being killed of approximately 25%. Dispersers orient to large diameter trees and join silk of others if encountered. These results align with observations of natural colonies in that adults and late-stage nymphs join existing colonies of non-kin. Experiments further demonstrated that dispersing females orient to vertical and larger diameter tree-like objects, a behavior that matched the distribution of field colonies. The ultimate reason for the observed dispersion pattern is probably because large trees support more expansive epiphytic algae and lichens (the food for this species), although the impact of food resources on dispersion has not been tested. Finally, further research questions and other webspinner species (including parthenogenetic ones) that warrant a closer look are described. Given that this group of primitively social insects, with approximately 1,000 species known, has remained virtually unstudied, one hope is that this report can encourage more exploration.

Highlights

  • For example, spiderlings grow more quickly and attain larger sizes when they share silk spun by larger conspecifics in the colony (Jakob, 1991)

  • A detailed field study of S. dumicola in Namibia showed that arboreal ants could be held at bay by social spiders capable of producing copious sticky silk (Henschel, 1998)

  • My detailed field censuses early on showed that dispersal out of the natal colony is a feature of the life cycle of A. urichi and that aggregations are not composed of overlapping generations of kin (Edgerly, 1988)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For a diversity of insects and spiders, ecological factors that can influence differential success of individuals living a solitary life or as part of a group include the costs and risks of dispersal, pressures imposed by predators and parasites, and competition for resources (reviewed in Choe and Crespi, 1997; Costa, 2006). Despite the value of shared silk, solitary individuals might do well to disperse to seek uncontested food or to avoid parasites that might have built up in the colony. Solitary silk spinners often can quickly construct a new domicile. Possible reasons for remaining part of a colony include greater protection from predators, more efficient prey capture if silk is used as a snare, taking advantage of the spinning by colony-mates and/or avoiding the costs and risks of dispersal. The tendency to share silk by social spiders of the genus Stegodyphus helps to protect individuals from predators as well as more efficiently traps prey (Seibt and Wickler, 1990). The authors found that higher degrees of sociality were negatively correlated with the tendency and ability to disperse

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call