Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands harbour many of Europe's species of conservation interest. Although larger grasslands are the focus of most conservation activity, many grassland fragments are scattered across landscapes –in small patches or along linear elements– which can form Grassland Green Infrastructure (GGI). GGI has the potential to enhance landscape diversity by creating functioning metacommunities comprising of large semi-natural grasslands and these surrounding fragments. While often highlighted in conservation policy, little is known about the biodiversity supported by green infrastructure itself and thus its conservation potential.To address this issue, we contrasted plant communities in 36 ‘core’ grassland sites across three European countries with communities in the surrounding GGI. We related compositional differences to amount and type of GGI habitat (patches or linear), and the distances for seed dispersal by livestock from core sites. We found substantial differences between the GGI and the core sites, with a mean 54% species turn-over. These differences indicated filtering of stress tolerant species characteristic of low nutrient conditions, and semi-natural grassland specialists. Species with poorer dispersal abilities declined strongly with increasing distances from the core sites. The many additional species in the GGI, not found in the core sites, were predominantly those with a competitive strategy and high seed dispersal ability.We conclude that the biodiversity-supporting role of GGI across Europe is severely constrained by eutrophication, dispersal limitation and external propagule pressure. Actions to improve the quality of GGI might include enhancing dispersal by livestock combined with more type-diversification and less intensively used grassland habitats.

Highlights

  • Habitat loss and fragmentation due to land use intensification is a major driver of plant biodiversity declines worldwide (Newbold et al, 2015; Auffret et al, 2018; Chase et al, 2020)

  • While conserving and establishing green infrastructure is promoted as a key approach for species conservation at the landscape scale (e.g., Concepcion et al, 2020), we found that plant communities in Grassland Green Infrastructure (GGI) were notably different to those in the core semi-natural grasslands

  • Our results suggest that the overall loss of large, species-rich grasslands across the study areas (Kimberley et al, 2021), and abandonment of grazing networks across Europe –whereby livestock is moved among grasslands (Willerding and Poschlod, 2002; Plue et al, 2019)– constrain the ability of grassland plant species to utilise GGI, in addition to straightforward effects of habitat quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Habitat loss and fragmentation due to land use intensification is a major driver of plant biodiversity declines worldwide (Newbold et al, 2015; Auffret et al, 2018; Chase et al, 2020). Smaller grassland frag­ ments, comprising road verges, old-field hedges and complex forest borders are often scattered throughout the landscape, many being remnants of pre­ viously larger grassland areas (Cousins, 2006; Auffret and Lindgren, 2020). These smaller fragments –though potentially lower in habitat quality– have the potential to form a network of Green Infrastructure (GI) around large semi-natural grasslands, and facilitate functioning species' meta­ communities that harbour more diversity at the landscape scale (Lindborg et al, 2014; Fahrig, 2017). Grass­ land vegetation is here defined in the broadest sense containing all habitat that could harbour (remnants of) populations of grassland species of con­ servation interest

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call