Abstract

Seed‐caching rodents have long been seen as important actors in dispersal ecology. Here, we focus on the interactions with plants in a fire‐disturbance community, specifically Arctostaphylos species (Ericaceae) in California chaparral. Although mutualistic relationships between caching rodents and plants are well studied, little is known how this type of relationship functions in a disturbance‐driven system, and more specifically to systems shaped by fire disturbance. By burying seeds in the soil, rodents inadvertently improve the probability of seed surviving high temperatures produced by fire. We test two aspects of vertical dispersal, depth of seed and multiple seeds in caches as two important dimensions of rodent‐caching behavior. We used a laboratory experimental approach to test seed survival under different heating conditions and seed bank structures. Creating a synthetic soil seed bank and synthetic fire/heating in the laboratory allowed us to have control over surface heating, depth of seed in the soil, and seed cache size. We compared the viability of Arctostaphylos viscida seeds from different treatment groups determined by these factors and found that, as expected, seeds slightly deeper in the soil had substantial increased chances of survival during a heating event. A key result was that some seeds within a cache in shallow soil could survive fire even at a depth with a killing heat pulse compared to isolated seeds; temperature measurements indicated lower temperatures immediately below caches compared to the same depth in adjacent soil. These results suggest seed caching by rodents increases seed survival during fire events in two ways, that caches disrupt heat flow or that caches are buried below the heat pulse kill zone. The context of natural disturbance drives the significance of this mutualism and further expands theory regarding mutualisms into the domain of disturbance‐driven systems.

Highlights

  • Scatter-hoarding rodents have long been seen as important actors in dispersal ecology (e.g., Vander Wall 2010), both consuming and burying seed

  • Scatter hoarding has principally been interpreted for differential dispersal to safe sites that improve establishment for plants (e.g., Hanzawa et al 1988; Hirsch et al 2012)

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scatter-hoarding rodents have long been seen as important actors in dispersal ecology (e.g., Vander Wall 2010), both consuming and burying seed. Scatter hoarding has principally been interpreted for differential dispersal to safe sites that improve establishment for plants (e.g., Hanzawa et al 1988; Hirsch et al 2012). Most research has focused on species with transient seed banks and ecosystems defined by infrequent, small disturbances, and long-lived species (Stapanian and Smith 1978; Sork 1983; Smallwood et al 2001; Sivy et al 2011). Less understood is how the relationship functions with persistent seed bank species in systems shaped by chronic and large-scale disturbance

Objectives
Methods
Results

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.