Abstract
Littoralization is a recent sign of spatial disparity in the southern Mediterranean. Syria differs from most of the countries of the region by virtue if its very light littoralization, but can it be considered a coherent entity without Beirut and Lebanon or without of the Gulf cities, which constitute an economic and banking platform essential to the whole region ? The spatial disparities are thus to be found outside of littoralization. Are they regional disparities ? In point of fact we can even wonder if «regions» exist in the Syria which was inherited from the Ottoman empire. It would seem to be the city/countryside disparity that is most deeply inscribed, and in any case it is against that phenomenon that the government has chosen to invest the most heavily, making rural improvement on of its most essential stands. But has that policy succeeded in erasing inherited disparities as well as rendering inoperative what is a tendancy to constitute hegemonic urban regions around the great historic centers ? The recent development of Damascus as a capital seems currently to be the principal catalyst for the institution of regional imbalance and spatial disparities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.