Disparities in survival in Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander patients with gastric adenocarcinoma: An NCDB analysis.

Abstract

253 Background: Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) individuals exhibit stark disparities in gastric cancer mortality rates, with AANHPI men facing a two-fold higher risk of death and AANHPI women encountering a 2.5-fold elevated risk compared to their Non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. However, the AANHPI community is a diverse group, including over 21 ethnic groups. Here, we identify disparities among AANHPI subpopulations with gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, which gathers data from over 1,500 accredited hospitals and facilities across the United States, this retrospective cohort study identified 141,906 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (ICD code “8140”). Races listed as “unknown/other” or “Other Asian” were excluded. Kaplan Meier and Cox Regression model were performed. Results: This study compared mean overall survival (OS) of NHW (n=111,137), East Asian (EA) (n=3,745), South Asian (SA) (n=760), Southeast Asian (SEA) (n=1,379), and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (NHPI) (n=325) patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. When aggregated, AANHPI had statistically significant improved OS compared to NHW (21.6 months vs 14.1 months, p < 0.001). After disaggregating, the mean OS was 26.9 months for EA; 21.3 months for SA; 14.5 months for SEA; and 14.3 months for NHPI. Only SA and EA had significantly improved OS than NHW (p<0.001 for both). SEA and NHPI had significantly worse outcomes than EA (p<0.001 for both) and SA (p<0.001 for SEA, and p = 0.033 for NHPI). Multivariate analysis accounted for age at diagnosis, insurance status, median income quartile, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, facility type, stage at diagnosis, and time to treatment. SA (HR=0.82; 95% CI, 0.726 to 0.925; p<0.001)), EA (HR=0.644; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.68; p<0.001), and SEA (HR=0.896; 95% CI, 0.821 to 0.978, p=0.014) had lower survival hazard ratios compared to NHW. NHPI (HR=0.931, 95% CI 0.775 to 1.119, p=0.448) did not have a statistically significant relationship compared to NHW. EA (HR = 0.637; 95% CI 0.548 to 0.741, p<0.001) and SA (HR = 0.793; 95% CI 0.667 to 0.943, p=0.007) had significantly lower survival hazard ratios compared to NHPI. Conclusions: Survival disparities exist among AANHPI subgroups with gastric adenocarcinoma. At first glance, OS appeared significantly greater for AANHPI patients compared to NHW. However, disaggregation of AANHPI subpopulations revealed that Southeast Asian and NHPI actually had comparable OS with NHW. After controlling for socioeconomic factors, NHPI had significantly worse hazard ratios compared to South Asian and East Asian. This highlights the need to disaggregate AANHPI data so that disparities among these diverse subpopulations can be identified, investigated and ultimately addressed.