Abstract

There is a growing literature demonstrating a link between lower socioeconomic status (SES) and poorer neuroanatomical health, such as smaller total and regional gray and white matter volumes, as well as greater white matter lesion volumes. Little is known, however, about the relation between SES and white matter integrity. Here we examined the relation between SES and white matter integrity of the brain’s primary cortical regions, and evaluated potential moderating influences of age and self-identified race. Participants were 192 neurologically intact, community-dwelling African American and White adults (mean age = 52 years; 44% male, 60% White, low SES = 52%) from the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span (HANDLS) SCAN study. Participants underwent 3.0-T cranial magnetic resonance imaging. Diffusion tensor imaging was used to estimate regional fractional anisotropy (FA) to quantify the brain’s white matter integrity and trace to capture diffusivity. Multiple regression analyses examined independent and interactive associations of SES, age, and race with FA of the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes bilaterally. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of several biopsychosocial risk factors on these associations. Exploratory analyses examined these relations with trace and using additional SES indicators. Results indicated there were no significant interactions of SES, age, and race for any region. Individuals with low SES had lower FA in all regions, and higher trace in the right and left frontal, right and left temporal, and left occipital lobes. Findings remained largely unchanged after inclusion of sensitivity variables. Older age was associated with lower FA and greater trace for all regions, except for the right temporal lobe with FA. No main effects were found for race in FA, and Whites had higher trace values in the parietal lobes. Novel findings of this study indicate that relative to the high SES group, low SES was associated with poorer white matter integrity and greater diffusivity. These results may, in part, reflect exposures to various biopsychosocial risk factors experienced by those of lower SES across the lifespan, and may help explain the preponderance of cognitive and functional disparities between socioeconomic groups.

Highlights

  • There is a burgeoning literature demonstrating a link between socioeconomic status (SES) and neuroanatomical health

  • In an important study conducted by Gianaros et al (2013), adiposity and smoking status independently mediated the relation between SES and white matter integrity, with highsensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) accounting for much of the variance in those meditational paths

  • No significant interactions were observed, our results suggest poorer diffuse white matter integrity, on average, for individuals of lower SES

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

There is a burgeoning literature demonstrating a link between socioeconomic status (SES) and neuroanatomical health. No studies have examined interactive relations among SES, race, and age with white matter integrity This is notable because previous research has shown that these sociodemographic characteristics may have synergistic influences on brain and other health endpoints. In an important study conducted by Gianaros et al (2013), adiposity and smoking status independently mediated the relation between SES and white matter integrity, with highsensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) accounting for much of the variance in those meditational paths This is consistent with the literature showing links between SES and poorer cardiovascular health (Pollitt et al, 2005), and between cardiovascular health and white matter integrity (Wersching et al, 2010; Stanek et al, 2011; Gow et al, 2012). Exploratory analyses examined (1) models using three different SES indicators on regional FA and (2) independent and interactive relations of SES, race, and age on trace diffusion, which captures diffusion of water across three perpendicular orientations

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Procedure
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.