Disparities in Acute Radiation-Related Pain and Dermatitis between Black and White Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Radiation Following Breast Conserving Surgery

Abstract

Historically, black patients with cancer experience poor clinical outcomes and low quality of life due to inadequate screening and management of cancer-related treatment toxicities. There are limited data documenting racial disparities in acute radiation-related toxicities (ARRTs) for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Therefore, we compared ARRTs between Black (B) and White (W) patients receiving adjuvant radiation following breast conserving surgery (BCS). This retrospective analysis included 317 patients with stage 0/1 breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation between October 2019 and February 2022. 29% (N = 81) were B and 71% (N = 236) were W, with an average age of 65 (range: 32-88) for both. We abstracted weekly on-treatment-visit clinical notes (OTVs) completed by a nurse and radiation oncologist who utilized the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse (CTCAE) v4.0 to evaluate each patient's pain score (scaled 0-10, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst), radiation dermatitis (RD; Grade 0-4), as well as non-CTCAE descriptors of pain and presence of hyperpigmentation or pruritus. We compared onset and severity of pain and rates of RD and pruritus between B and W patients. The proportion reporting pain was significantly lower among B vs. W patients (43.8% vs. 63.6%; P = 0.002). Of patients qualitatively reporting pain, B patients were significantly more likely to have their pain scored as 0 than W patients (24.3% vs. 11.7%; P = 0.024). B patients had significantly lower median pain scores than W patients (P = 0.010), with a median score of 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0-5.5) vs. 5 (IQR: 4-8). B patients had a significantly longer time to pain identification than W patients (P = 0.027), with median time to pain of 10th fraction (IQR: 4-13.5) vs. 8th fraction (IQR: 4-11). Radiation dermatitis was graded as 0 (50.6% vs 8.5%; P<0.001), 1 (44.4% vs 82.6%; P<0.001), 2 (14.8% vs 15.3%, P = NS), and 3 (3.7% vs 0.4%; P = 0.023), with no grade 4 RD, amongst B and W patients, respectively. Of note, B patients experiencing mild hyperpigmentation were graded as 0. We found no statistically significant differences in incidence of pruritus. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of ARRTs based on CTCAE v4.0 show discordance in pain scores and radiation dermatitis. The underscoring of pain amongst B patients suggests possible cultural hesitancy to report pain or implicit biases in evaluating pain suggesting the need for alternative ways to discuss and score pain in B patients. Our data suggests that CTCAE does not effectively assess radiation dermatitis in B patients. There are no descriptors of hyperpigmentation in grading of radiation dermatitis in CTCAE, which may lead to underreporting in dark-skinned individuals. Better assessment tools are needed to document ARRTs to ensure appropriate evaluation and treatment across all racial groups.