Disparities by race, socioeconomic status, and insurance type in the receipt of NCCN guideline concordant care for select cancer types in California.

Abstract

7031 Background: There are a limited number of studies that have evaluated the association between National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline adherence and survival across different cancers. We aim to assess the relationship between race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), insurance type and the receipt of NCCN guideline concordant cancer care and survival. Methods: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with 7 types of invasive cancer using the California Cancer Registry. Adherence with NCCN guidelines was defined by appropriate surgical, radiation, and chemo- or hormonal therapies. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between the patient, insurance type, tumor, and guideline adherence. Disease-specific survival analysis was performed using multivariate proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 543,198 patients were identified with invasive cancer between 2004-2017 (cases by disease type: breast 189,311, prostate 156,502, colon 80,102, liver 25,857, gastric 22,066, ovary 22,551, and cervix 16,691). The proportion of patients receiving NCCN guideline-concordant care varied by disease type. Non-concordant guideline treatment was associated with increased disease-specific mortality across all cancer types: breast (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.23-1.33), prostate (HR 1.31, 95%CI 1.22-1.41), colon (HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.67-1.78), liver (HR 2.52, 95%CI 2.42-2.63), gastric (HR 2.38, 2.28-2.49), ovary (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.26-1.38), and cervical cancer (HR 1.17, 95%CI 1.08-1.26). In multivariate models, compared to White, black patients were less likely to receive guideline concordant care for breast (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.84-0.92), prostate (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.86-0.93), colon (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.79-0.92), and ovarian cancer (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.62-0.82). Compared to Managed care insurance patients, Medicaid payer status was also associated with lower guideline concordant care for breast (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.78-0.84), prostate (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.97), colon (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.65-0.75), gastric (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.63-0.75), and liver cancer (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.61-0.72). Conclusions: Less than half of cancer patients received NCCN guideline concordant care. There was an incremental relationship observed between SES and the likelihood of receiving guideline concordant care. Patients receiving non-guideline concordant care had worse disease-specific survival.