Abstract

Over the last decade, the local government finance system in England has experienced ‘genuinely revolutionary change’: overall revenues have declined and councils are now more reliant on locally raised taxes. Importantly, the nature of change has varied geographically: urban councils serving poorer communities have experienced the biggest declines in their service spending. This paper considers the impact of these spatially uneven changes on the voluntary sector. We follow through time charities known to be in receipt of local government funding at the time of peak council budgets in 2009–2010 and describe trends in the income of these charities until 2016–2017. We show that, just as the pattern of change in local government financing has been spatially uneven, so the trend in charities’ income has varied geographically. Indeed the spatially regressive nature of recent change in charities’ income is remarkable: while the median charity in the least deprived decile of the local authority distribution experienced little change in their income, the median charity in the most deprived decile experienced a 20% decline. The results provide the strongest evidence to date that, in countries with a history of partnership between government and the voluntary sector, voluntary organisations in more deprived areas are particularly vulnerable to sizeable reductions in the level of local government spending. Indeed, by illustrating for the first time the sizeable reductions in the income of charities in disadvantaged communities, the results demonstrate an important mechanism through which ‘austerity urbanism’ becomes salient in the lives of individuals in deprived areas.

Highlights

  • The geographical nature of ‘revolutionary’ changes in local government financingOver the last decade, the local government1 finance system in England has been experiencing ‘genuinely revolutionary change’ (Amin-Smith et al, 2016: 1)

  • Before recent changes, this system was highly centralised: from 1948 central government grants sought to adjust for differences between local authorities in the ability to raise local tax revenues; from 1958 these grants sought to adjust for differences between local authorities in social need; from 1990 the revenue from local business rates was redistributed nationally according to spending need (Hendry, 1998)

  • Overall there are dual reinforcing reasons for expecting the effect of changes in local authority financing to be spatially uneven and to have a particular impact on the voluntary sector in more deprived areas: more deprived local authorities were more dependent on central government grants than less deprived local authorities (Figure 1) and have seen more significant changes in their spending power since 2010; charitable organisations in more deprived local authorities have on average been more reliant on public funding than in less deprived local authorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The geographical nature of ‘revolutionary’ changes in local government financingOver the last decade, the local government1 finance system in England has been experiencing ‘genuinely revolutionary change’ (Amin-Smith et al, 2016: 1). Overall there are dual reinforcing reasons for expecting the effect of changes in local authority financing to be spatially uneven and to have a particular impact on the voluntary sector in more deprived areas: more deprived local authorities were more dependent on central government grants than less deprived local authorities (Figure 1) and have seen more significant changes in their spending power since 2010; charitable organisations in more deprived local authorities have on average been more reliant on public funding than in less deprived local authorities.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call