DISP-10. RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL AND ACCESS TO CARE OUTCOMES IN NEUROSURGICAL-ONCOLOGY PATIENTS

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Large database studies have identified racial and socioeconomic differences in neurosurgical-oncologic outcomes. For clearer insights and understanding, more detailed and prospective evaluation is needed. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a database of 1475 patients undergoing surgery for CNS tumors over 5 years. Multivariate analysis, specific to various pathologies, was conducted to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors (including age, sex, racial identity, primary language, insurance status, and income estimate) associated with access to care and clinical outcomes. Additionally, prospective patient-centered interviews were conducted on neuro- oncology patients to qualitatively explore reasons for disparities in healthcare. RESULTS Significant associations were found between racial identities (White n=911; Hispanic n=285; Asian n=206; Black n=74) and sex (ANOVA p 0.0043), age (p<0.0001), income estimate (p<0.0001), primary language (p<0.0001), and insurance status (p<0.0001). Among different pathologies, presentation to the ED, rather than outpatient setting, was consistently associated with a non- English primary language (p=0.0312) and Medi-Cal insurance (p=0.0029). Time from imaging diagnosis to neurosurgical consultation was associated with non- English primary language (p=0.0262) and Medi-Cal (p=0.0030). Delay between recommendation for surgery and date of surgery was significant in Black patients (p=0.0112). A non- English primary language was negatively associated with having a gross total resection (p=0.0087). Notably, adjuvant treatments were less likely for those with non-English primary language (p=0.0203), Black race (p=0.0049), and Medi-Cal coverage (p=0.0014). Cox regression analysis identified only age (p<0.0001) as a predictor of poorer overall survival in oncologic cases. Prospective interviews identified cultural, economic (work- related), and healthcare navigation issues as reasons for differences in access to care. CONCLUSIONS Across the spectrum of neurosurgical oncology diagnoses, racial and socioeconomic factors independently associate with access to care but not clinical outcome variables. Further investigation is needed, particularly in patients with non- English primary languages and cultural attitudes towards chemotherapy and radiation therapy.