Disordered eating symptoms as a function of perceived weight status and race: An intersectional examination

Abstract

Disordered eating (DE) exhibited by individuals with intersecting marginalized identities may be less likely to be perceived as pathological compared to DE exhibited by individuals with non-marginalized identities. The present experiment tested the intersectional impact of weight status and race stimuli on responses to DE in a college sample. Undergraduate students (N = 193, Mage = 18.57, SD = 1.88, 71 % female) read a fictional account from a female target with DE who was described as “underweight,” “average weight,” or “overweight,” and “White” or “Black.” Participants completed an in-lab survey assessing detection of and responses to DE. Three 2 (race: Black, White) x 3 (weight status: underweight, average weight, overweight) ANCOVAs revealed a main effect of weight status. DE was more likely to be detected in “underweight” than “average” and “overweight” targets (p < .001). Participants encouraged weight loss for “average” and “overweight” targets compared to “underweight" targets (p < .001) and encouraged weight restoration for “underweight” targets compared to “average weight” and “overweight” targets (p < .001). No significant effects for target race or interaction between weight status and race emerged. These findings underscore the salience of weight status in shaping perceptions of DE.