Abstract
AbstractKubernetes is a container orchestration system, which is used in production-ready platform as a service such as OpenShift. To manage and provision storage for application, the container storage interface (CSI) exists in container orchestration systems. The article contains comparison analyze of bare-metal CSI implementations that shows advantages and disadvantages of existing CSI implementations, based on which bare-metal implementation is thought to be a most powerful one, but not free from a gap for improvement. So, there is a need to extend CSI for bare-metal storage provisioning to avoid virtualization and cloud overhead and minimize manual storage management operations. The paper considers bare-metal CSI extension for automation of local disk management as well including ephemeral volume support.KeywordsContainer storage interfaceKubernetesEphemeral volumes
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
