Abstract

That climate change is a major disruptor of rural livelihoods in the low‐ and middle‐income countries, including sub‐Saharan Africa, has been a key narrative for the continent's development for at least a decade. And while the severity of climate impacts on African development should not be underestimated, in this paper I argue that the vulnerability of smallholders in São Tomé and Príncipe should be considered in the broader political economic and historical context of progressing depeasantisation and proletarianisation of global agricultural labour. Moreover, I posit that certain smallholders' vulnerability can actually increase as a result of both autonomous and externally planned adaptation strategies, the latter most commonly promoted by governments and their international development partners. To substantiate these arguments, the paper combines theoretical insights from labour geography and critical adaptation studies with ethnographic data collected in Liberdade – a village in the small island nation of São Tomé and Príncipe – which participated in a nationwide climate change adaptation project. I trace local smallholders' vulnerability back to the country's political economic history and complement this by an investigation of the changing labour relations at the community level. Here, I analyse the autonomous adaptation strategies pursued by the residents and critically assess the localised effects of planned adaptation embodied by the project, with a specific focus on how they affect local labour relations. I conclude by providing some reflections on addressing the current pitfalls of planned adaptation.

Highlights

  • The contemporary development doctrine followed by large donors (e.g. World Bank, United Nations, Western aid agencies) identifies climate change as one of the main causes of socio‐economic vulnerability in sub‐Saharan Africa

  • Statistical data confirms this, suggesting that the share of agricultural employment in sub‐Saharan Africa has shrunk from almost 63% to just under 55% between 1992 and 2018 (World Bank, 2019b)

  • The case of Liberdade demonstrates that smallholders' vulnerability to climate change impacts stems from both past and current agricultural development processes, which are highly uneven

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The contemporary development doctrine followed by large donors (e.g. World Bank, United Nations, Western aid agencies) identifies climate change as one of the main causes of socio‐economic vulnerability in sub‐Saharan Africa (see World Bank, 2013, 2015). I posit that the origin of the region's vulnerability lies in neoliberal thinking. MIKULEWICZ transplanted into discussions and practices specific to adaptation to climate change. In combining insights from labour geography and critical adaptation studies, my aim is to address the “conspicuous silence” of labour geographers on the issue of climate change (Parsons and Natarajan, this issue), when it comes to local‐level analyses (Lenschow et al, 2016)

Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.