Abstract
Concerns about fictitious pricing and bait-and-switch practices, once commonplace, have been relegated to the regulatory attic for far too long. The singular theme that undergirds these tactics, “dishonest” search disruption, highlights a broader concern about how these tactics disrupt markets by leading consumers to make suboptimal transactional decisions. If treated collectively, regulators may find reason to take these deceptive tactics seriously. Addressing “dishonest search disruption” as a distinct phenomenon may ultimately frame a way for regulators to bring enforcement down from the attic and back into the active enforcement arena.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
