Abstract
This study aims to analyze the problems with Supreme Court Regulation in Judicial Review resulting from inconsistencies in these rules, which impact the court's ability to enforce these regulations. This study is a normative legal analysis. The findings of this study indicate that the problem of discordant norms in judicial review is related to two factors, specifically discordant norms regarding the authority to examine formal matters. The discord of norms about the legal subject matter of the Petitioner for Review of Legislation under the Act results from differences in regulation of judicial review material aspect used as a criterion. This contradicts the original intent of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
