Abstract
The dynamics of changes in the Act Number 41 of 1999 on Forestry have an impact on the disharmonization of arrangements regarding corporate criminal liability. Referring to the principle of legality, criminal liability must refer to the clarity of the formulation in law. Disharmonization of corporate criminal liability arrangements in forestry law can be a problem in the realm of law enforcement. This research aims to provide an analytical description related to the harmonization of corporate criminal liability arrangements in forestry law. The method used is fully conducted through literature study associated with legal theories related to corporate criminal liability. The results showed that there are several provisions of corporate criminal liability in forestry law that are not synchronized with each other. Therefore, harmonization steps are needed, which in theory and practice. Suggestions that can be submitted to the House of Representatives are: There needs to be fundamental changes, especially regarding corporate criminal liability in forestry law which is regulated separately in the Forestry Law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
