Abstract
Muguerza is a great connoisseur of Kant, but his criticisms of the Kantian moral have been growing over time. He has dissented from the Kantian principle of universalization, has priorized the principle of autonomy and has also criticized the Kantian Kingdom of Ends, by proposing its own conception of moral individualism, based on the alternative of dissent. This article discusses some of Muguerza’s criticisms of Kant, especially those concerning the universalist and imperative character of his moral philosophy. Other objections to Kantian moral individualism are also discussed, coming from feminist ethics and from neuroethics. Finally, an axiological interpretation of morality it’s suggested, according to which Kant’s and Muguerza’s principles can be considered as conflicting values. By priorizing one or the other set of values different conceptions of ethical individualism arise.
Highlights
Muguerza is a great connoisseur of Kant
moral have been growing over time
He has dissented from the Kantian principle of universalization
Summary
Siendo Muguerza un gran conocedor de Kant, sus críticas a la moral kantiana han ido creciendo con el tiempo. Muguerza ha disentido del principio kantiano de universalización, ha primado el principio de autonomía y ha criticado el reino de los fines para, finalmente, ha elaborado una concepción propia del individualismo moral, basada en la alternativa del disenso. En este artículo se comentan algunas de las críticas de Muguerza a Kant, sobre todo las que atacan el carácter universalista e imperativo de la moral kantiana.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
