Abstract

Recently, new alternative matrices of biodiversity such as phylogenetic and functional diversity as a complement to species diversity have provided new insights into the mechanisms of community assembly. In this study, we analyzed the phylogenetic signals of five functional traits and the relative contribution of environmental variables and distance matrices to the alpha and beta components of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity in woody plant assemblages along four local elevational transects on two different mountains. We observed low but significant phylogenetic signals of functional traits, which suggest that phylogenetic dispersion can provide a rough approximation of functional dispersion but not perfect correlations between phylogenetic and functional diversity. Taxonomic alpha diversity showed a monotonic decline with elevation, and climatic variables were the main drivers of this pattern along all studied transects. Furthermore, although the phylogenetic and functional alpha dispersions showed different elevational patterns including increase, decrease and no relationship, the underlying processes driving the patterns of both types of alpha dispersion could be explained by the gradients of climatic and habitat variables as well as biotic interactions such as competition. These results suggest that both alpha dispersion patterns may be significantly controlled by niche-based deterministic processes such as biotic interactions and environmental filtering in our study areas. Moreover, the beta diversity with geographical distances showed distance-decay relationships for all transects. Although the relative importance of the environmental and geographical distances for beta diversity varied across the three facets of diversity and the transects, we generally found that environmental distances were more important for the beta components of the three facets of diversity. However, we cannot discriminate the effects of both distances on the three facets of diversity. Therefore, our study suggests that niche-based deterministic processes, potentially combined with neutral processes such as dispersal limitation and demographic stochasticity, may influence patterns of woody plant assemblage turnover in our study areas.

Highlights

  • Quantifying the drivers shaping the spatial distribution and composition of biodiversity in ecosystems is a critical issue in ecology and biogeography

  • Blomberg’s K and Pagel’s λ values for each functional trait were less than 1, all traits exhibited significant phylogenetic signals (Table 2). These results suggest that using phylogenetic distance as a surrogate for differences in functional traits is appropriate for woody species along the four elevational transects in this study

  • The advantage of the present study is the exploration of elevational patterns and processes using empirical data collected at local scales along with integrative analyses of three aspects of biodiversity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying the drivers shaping the spatial distribution and composition of biodiversity in ecosystems is a critical issue in ecology and biogeography. Species diversity and composition vary along disturbance or habitat heterogeneity gradients at fine scales [6, 7] Such studies have mainly highlighted components of taxonomic diversity such as species richness, which treat all species as evolutionarily independent and ecologically equivalent and may not convey enough information regarding the mechanisms underlying evolutionary histories or functional traits [8, 9]. For this reason, new alternative biodiversity matrices such as phylogenetic and functional diversity have been proposed during the past decade to improve our understanding of the drivers underlying biodiversity patterns, and ecologists have increasingly used these two different facets of biodiversity to provide new insights into studies on community ecology [10, 11]. Of these two new facets of biodiversity, phylogenetic diversity reflects the accumulated evolutionary and biogeographic history of a community [8], whereas functional diversity provides information regarding ongoing ecological processes inferred from morphological, physiological and ecological traits [11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.