Abstract
The weak axiom of revealed preference (WARP) ensures that the revealed preference (i) is a preference relation (i.e., it is complete and transitive) and (ii) rationalizes the choices. However, when WARP fails, either one of these two properties is violated, but it is unclear which one it is. We provide an alternative characterization of WARP by showing that WARP is equivalent to the conjunction of two axioms each of which separately guarantees (i) and (ii).
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
