Abstract

BackgroundLarge uncertainty in modeling land carbon (C) uptake heavily impedes the accurate prediction of the global C budget. Identifying the uncertainty sources among models is crucial for model improvement yet has been difficult due to multiple feedbacks within Earth System Models (ESMs). Here we present a Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP) under a unified model traceability framework to evaluate multiple soil organic carbon (SOC) models. Using the MEMIP, we analyzed how the vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry structure influences SOC prediction in two soil organic matter (SOM) models. By comparing the model outputs from the C-only and CN modes, the SOC differences contributed by individual processes and N feedback between vegetation and soil were explicitly disentangled.ResultsResults showed that the multi-layer models with a vertically resolved structure predicted significantly higher SOC than the single layer models over the historical simulation (1900–2000). The SOC difference between the multi-layer models was remarkably higher than between the single-layer models. Traceability analysis indicated that over 80% of the SOC increase in the multi-layer models was contributed by the incorporation of depth-related processes, while SOC differences were similarly contributed by the processes and N feedback between models with the same soil depth representation.ConclusionsThe output suggested that feedback is a non-negligible contributor to the inter-model difference of SOC prediction, especially between models with similar process representation. Further analysis with TRENDY v7 and more extensive MEMIP outputs illustrated the potential important role of multi-layer structure to enlarge the current ensemble spread and the necessity of more detail model decomposition to fully disentangle inter-model differences. We stressed the importance of analyzing ensemble outputs from the fundamental model structures, and holding a holistic view in understanding the ensemble uncertainty.

Highlights

  • Whether or not the current land carbon (C) sink will persist into the future is a major source of uncertainty in assessing the global C budget (Friedlingstein et al 2019; Piao et al 2020)

  • Comparison between the single and multiple layer models By explicitly representing the vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry structure, the two ML models predicted higher soil organic carbon (SOC) amounts across large regions (Fig. 2)

  • Further decomposing τE into separate components, the ML structure caused similar changes of spatial patterns in various τE components for the two models compared to the SL structure (Fig. 3). ξT only increased in areas with latitudes approximately higher than 40°N and the of a specific variable; SL: BGC-CEN is the difference between BGC_SL and CEN_SL of a specific variable; ML: BGC-CEN is the difference between

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Whether or not the current land carbon (C) sink will persist into the future is a major source of uncertainty in assessing the global C budget (Friedlingstein et al 2019; Piao et al 2020). Outputs of Model Inter-comparison Projects (MIPs) provide information of global land C storage and budget for single model and ensembled projections. Large uncertainty in modeling land carbon (C) uptake heavily impedes the accurate prediction of the global C budget. Identifying the uncertainty sources among models is crucial for model improvement yet has been difficult due to multiple feedbacks within Earth System Models (ESMs). We present a Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP) under a unified model traceability framework to evaluate multiple soil organic carbon (SOC) models. By comparing the model outputs from the C-only and CN modes, the SOC differences contributed by individual processes and N feedback between vegetation and soil were explicitly disentangled

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call