Disease-Modifying Mutations in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract

HomeCirculationVol. 117, No. 14Disease-Modifying Mutations in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBDisease-Modifying Mutations in Familial Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyComplexity From Simplicity Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner, PhD and Ralph Knöll, MD Denise Hilfiker-KleinerDenise Hilfiker-Kleiner From the Department of Cardiology & Angiology Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany (D.H.-K.) and the Heart Centre Göttingen, Georg August University, Goettingen, Germany (R.K.). Search for more papers by this author and Ralph KnöllRalph Knöll From the Department of Cardiology & Angiology Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany (D.H.-K.) and the Heart Centre Göttingen, Georg August University, Goettingen, Germany (R.K.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published8 Apr 2008https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.767657Circulation. 2008;117:1775–1777Cardiomyopathies are primary disorders of cardiac muscle associated with abnormalities of cardiac wall thickness, chamber size, contraction, relaxation, conduction, and rhythm. They are a major cause of morbidity and mortality at all ages and, like acquired forms of cardiovascular disease, frequently progress into heart failure.1 In contrast to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which is characterized by left or biventricular dilation in association with depressed myocardial contractility,1 familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) is characterized by increased cardiac mass with myocyte and myofibrillar disarray. The disease is associated with electrical instability (ie, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias), which makes it the leading cause of death in young athletes. There is marked diversity in the morphological features and clinical manifestations of both DCM and FHC.2Article p 1820Family studies have demonstrated that hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a heritable disorder that is transmitted as an autosomal-dominant trait or as a sporadic disease. There is neither a racial nor an ethnic predisposition to this condition. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is not a rare condition; several noninvasive studies have demonstrated echocardiographic criteria for this disease in 0.2% of young adults (reviewed by Maron3).Genetic linkage studies in FHC have found disease loci on at least 14 different genes, most of them encoding sarcomeric genes; hence, FHC has been called a disease of the sarcomere. In addition, several mutations within the Ras pathway have been shown to cause at least syndromic forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,4,5 pointing to the presence of additional but poorly understood disease-causing and/or modifier genes.Thus far, however, most of the clinical heterogeneity of FHC has been accounted for by the substantial diversity of gene defects that cause the condition (ie, up to 45% of disease-causing mutations have been observed in the β-myosin heavy chain [MHC] gene myh7 and up to 35% in the myosin binding protein C gene mybpc3). Although recent reports pointed to the presence of compound-heterozygous and double-heterozygous mutations in at least 5% of all affected individuals, the study by Tsoutsman et al6 in this issue of Circulation provides the first in vivo experimental evidence for the role of double-heterozygous missense mutations in FHC and in cardiomyopathy in general.In an elegant series of experiments, Tsoutsman et al6 generated and analyzed the first double-mutant mouse model with heterozygous mutations in the cardiac αmhc gene together with a missense mutation in the troponin I (tni) gene. Both mutations are known to be associated with FHC in humans, and experimental evidence for each mutation in mouse models recreated most of the features of FHC. In fact, a recent publication reported that missense mutations in tni were present in 3% of a test population of 100 black subjects.7Strikingly, the resulting double-mutant mouse model is associated with a stunningly severe early onset (postnatal day 14) dilated cardiomyopathy without a prolonged hypertrophic phase but with significant cardiac fibrosis, conduction system abnormalities, severe heart failure, and death by age 21 days.The fact that the combination of both mutations results not in massive hypertrophy but rather in a severe DCM-like phenotype is unexpected and provides novel experimental insights. Although FHC and DCM phenotypes can be clinically distinguished in affected patients, a variety of genes, such as myh7 or mybpc3, can harbor mutations leading to both diseases.8 The presence of 2 or more mutations, either double- or compound-heterozygous and/or homozygous, might help to explain why up to 10% of all FHC patients develop a DCM-like phenotype later in life.2 Moreover, it complicates genotype–phenotype relationships, because gene dosage effects are likely to affect the clinical phenotype. A few examples have been published recently, among them the k207q myh7 mutation, in which heterozygous individuals develop a hypertrophic phenotype but those with the homozygous variant (only 1 individual) develop a DCM-like phenotype.9 Thus, the tni-203/mhc-403 mouse model supports the clinical observation that ≈5% of all individuals affected by FHC carry compound- and/or double-heterozygous mutations and exhibit a more severe phenotype.In searching for the underlying mechanisms responsible for the rapid progression into dilation and heart failure in tni-203/mhc-403 double-mutant mice, Tsoutsman et al6 performed a detailed functional and molecular analysis. They observed an increase in malignant tachycardias, which may be explained by the massive fibrosis, a possible substrate for electrical instability. However, changes in calcium metabolism, such as cardiac ryanodine receptor instability, have also been shown to cause severe arrhythmias.10 In fact, Tsoutsman et al6 reported a significant reduction in the mRNA expression of the cardiac L-type calcium channel, cardiac ryanodine receptor (ryr2), sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (serca2a) and phospholamban (plb) genes. Because brain natriuretic peptide has also been found to be significantly upregulated in tni-203/mhc-403 mice and because it has been shown to downregulate serca2a expression, brain natriuretic peptide induction might be, at least in part, responsible for serca2a downregulation.11 Brain natriuretic peptide gene expression itself depends on activity of the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells. However, Tsoutsman et al6 did not find evidence of the activated upstream signaling mechanisms of the nuclear factor of activated T cells, mainly mitogen activated protein kinases, in tni-203/mhc-403 mice. In fact, the only signaling molecule that was substantially activated with onset of disease symptoms in tni-203/mhc-403 mice was signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3), a molecule that acts as a signaling mediator and transcription factor within the janus kinase/STAT signaling pathway.This observation raises the question of how and why STAT3 is activated in this double-mutant model of FHC. The correlation of increased STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation with the onset of disease suggests that STAT3 activation may not be a direct consequence of either mutation or even the combination of both mutations, but may rather result from a secondary stress response. In this regard, experimental studies showed that STAT3 is rapidly and transiently activated under various stress conditions, such as pressure overload and hypoxia and in acute myocardial infarction.12–14 Most notably, STAT3 is activated by the interleukin-6 cytokine family, which signals through the shared receptor gp130.15–17 Recent studies reported that STAT3 is also activated by angiotensin II via the AT1 receptor in isolated cardiomyocytes and in the heart.18,19 Interestingly, a link between STAT3 and the angiotensin II autocrine loop has been suggested, as a strong binding activity of STAT3 to the angiotensinogen gene promoter has been described in cardiomyocytes.20 STAT3 thereby drives angiotensinogen expression, from which angiotensin II is generated through proteolysis. Such an autocrine loop could explain the constitutively strong activation of STAT3 in tni-203/mhc-403 mice and raises the question of an activated renin-angiotensin system in these mice.Tsoutsman et al6 emphasize that the observed STAT3 activation at the onset of cardiac disease symptoms in tni-203/mhc-403 double-mutant mice is indicative of the start of endogenous protection systems. Indeed, STAT3 signaling holds important roles in promoting cardiomyocyte survival and adaptive hypertrophy.16 For instance, STAT3 protects the heart from ischemic injury and age-related failure16 and plays an important role in protecting the heart from oxidative damage in response to cytotoxic agents and to the physiological stress of pregnancy.16Although these experimental data on STAT3 signaling point to a largely beneficial role in the protection of the heart against physiological and pathophysiological stress, reports also exist on potential adverse effects of STAT3 activation in the heart. For example, it has been reported that the janus kinase/STAT axis is involved in unfavorable changes after infarction, such as alteration of gene activity that may underlie early diastolic dysfunction (ie, upregulation of phosphatase 1 and downregulation of p16-phospholamban), as well as downregulation of Kv4.2 gene expression that may underlie increased arrhythmogenicity of the postinfarction heart.21 In agreement with such an effect, Tsoutsman et al6 observed enhanced induction of ventricular arrhythmias in tni-203/mhc-403 mice with onset of disease symptoms. Along the same lines, it is known that interleukin-6, the classic cytokine known to activate STAT3, reduces cardiomyocyte contractility in vitro, partly by decreasing intracellular Ca2+ transients, most probably due to the downregulation of serca2a in cardiomyocytes, another feature that Tsoutsman et al6 describe in tni-203/mhc-403 mice. Furthermore, a recent article in Circulation19 emphasizes that angiotensin II–mediated activation of STAT3 in cardiomyocytes may contribute to adverse remodeling caused by an activated renin-angiotensin system.In conclusion, the tni-203/mhc-403 double-mutant mouse model used by Tsoutsman et al6 uncovered numerous interesting novel features in the pathophysiology of FHC, of which only a few were mentioned in this editorial. Specifically interesting to us is the observation that although each mutation by itself is linked to a hypertrophic phenotype, the combination of both rapidly progresses to dilatation. This finding suggests that DCM and FHC, even though clinically distinct, might under certain conditions represent different stages of the same disease. Further exploration of the underlying molecular mechanisms, that is, the modality and the precise role of signaling pathways (ie, STAT3) in the tni-203/mhc-403 double-mutant mouse model, may provide important novel information that in the long run may help to optimize the pharmacological management of FHC.The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner, PhD, Abt. Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail [email protected] References 1 Ahmad F, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. The genetic basis for cardiac remodeling. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005; 6: 185–216.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Braunwald E, Zipes D, Libby P. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 2007.Google Scholar3 Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002; 287: 1308–1320.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Razzaque MA, Nishizawa T, Komoike Y, Yagi H, Furutani M, Amo R, Kamisago M, Momma K, Katayama H, Nakagawa M, Fujiwara Y, Matsushima M, Mizuno K, Tokuyama M, Hirota H, Muneuchi J, Higashinakagawa T, Matsuoka R. Germline gain-of-function mutations in RAF1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 1013–1017.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Schubbert S, Zenker M, Rowe SL, Boll S, Klein C, Bollag G, van der Burgt I, Musante L, Kalscheuer V, Wehner LE, Nguyen H, West B, Zhang KY, Sistermans E, Rauch A, Niemeyer CM, Shannon K, Kratz CP. Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 331–336.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Tsoutsman T, Kelly M, Ng DCH, Tan J-E, Tu E, Lam L, Bogoyevitch M, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Semsarian C. Severe heart failure and early mortality in a double-mutation mouse model of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1820–1831.LinkGoogle Scholar7 Frazier A, Judge DP, Schulman SP, Johnson N, Holmes KW, Murphy AM. Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain and troponin I mutations. Pediatr Cardiol. January 4, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-007-9177-9. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/5640703k1322w642/.Google Scholar8 Nanni L, Pieroni M, Chimenti C, Simionati B, Zimbello R, Maseri A, Frustaci A, Lanfranchi G. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: two homozygous cases with “typical” hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and three new mutations in cases with progression to dilated cardiomyopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003; 309: 391–398.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Alpert NR, Mohiddin SA, Tripodi D, Jacobson-Hatzell J, Vaughn-Whitley K, Brosseau C, Warshaw DM, Fananapazir L. Molecular and phenotypic effects of heterozygous, homozygous, and compound heterozygote myosin heavy-chain mutations. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H1097–H1102.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Lehnart SE, Wehrens XH, Marks AR. Defective ryanodine receptor interdomain interactions may contribute to intracellular Ca2+ leak: a novel therapeutic target in heart failure. Circulation. 2005; 111: 3342–3346.LinkGoogle Scholar11 Kogler H, Schott P, Toischer K, Milting H, Van PN, Kohlhaas M, Grebe C, Kassner A, Domeier E, Teucher N, Seidler T, Knoll R, Maier LS, El-Banayosy A, Korfer R, Hasenfuss G. Relevance of brain natriuretic peptide in preload-dependent regulation of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase expression. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2724–2732.LinkGoogle Scholar12 Funamoto M, Fujio Y, Kunisada K, Negoro S, Tone E, Osugi T, Hirota H, Izumi M, Yoshizaki K, Walsh K, Kishimoto T, Yamauchi-Takihara K. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for glycoprotein 130-mediated induction of vascular endothelial growth factor in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 10561–10566.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Hattori R, Maulik N, Otani H, Zhu L, Cordis G, Engelman RM, Siddiqui MA, Das DK. Role of STAT3 in ischemic preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001; 33: 1929–1936.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Fuchs M, Kaminski K, Schaefer A, Schieffer B, Hillmer A, Schmiedl A, Ding Z, Podewski E, Poli V, Schneider MD, Schulz R, Park JK, Wollert KC, Drexler H. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for myocardial capillary growth, control of interstitial matrix deposition, and heart protection from ischemic injury. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 187–195.LinkGoogle Scholar15 Aaronson DS, Horvath CM. A road map for those who know JAK-STAT. Science. 2002; 296: 1653–1655.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16 Fischer P, Hilfiker-Kleiner D. Survival pathways in hypertrophy and heart failure: the gp130-STAT3 axis. Basic Res Cardiol. 2007; 102: 393–411.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17 Heinrich PC, Behrmann I, Muller-Newen G, Schaper F, Graeve L. Interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling through the gp130/Jak/STAT pathway. Biochem J. 1998; 334 (pt 2): 297–314.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18 Mascareno E, Beckles DL, Siddiqui MA. Janus kinase-2 signaling mediates apoptosis in rat cardiomyocytes. Vascul Pharmacol. 2005; 43: 327–335.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19 Tsai CT, Lai LP, Kuo KT, Hwang JJ, Hsieh CS, Hsu KL, Tseng CD, Tseng YZ, Chiang FT, Lin JL. Angiotensin II activates signal transducer and activators of transcription 3 via Rac1 in atrial myocytes and fibroblasts: implication for the therapeutic effect of statin in atrial structural remodeling. Circulation. 2008; 117: 344–355.LinkGoogle Scholar20 Mascareno E, Dhar M, Siddiqui MA. Signal transduction and activator of transcription (STAT) protein-dependent activation of angiotensinogen promoter: a cellular signal for hypertrophy in cardiac muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 5590–5594.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21 El-Adawi H, Deng L, Tramontano A, Smith S, Mascareno E, Ganguly K, Castillo R, El-Sherif N. The functional role of the JAK-STAT pathway in post-infarction remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57: 129–138.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Metskas L and Rhoades E (2016) Order–Disorder Transitions in the Cardiac Troponin Complex, Journal of Molecular Biology, 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.022, 428:15, (2965-2977), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Metskas L and Rhoades E (2015) Conformation and Dynamics of the Troponin I C-Terminal Domain: Combining Single-Molecule and Computational Approaches for a Disordered Protein Region, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 10.1021/jacs.5b04471, 137:37, (11962-11969), Online publication date: 23-Sep-2015. Spudich J (2014) Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Four Decades of Basic Research on Muscle Lead to Potential Therapeutic Approaches to These Devastating Genetic Diseases, Biophysical Journal, 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.011, 106:6, (1236-1249), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014. Bachelier-Walenta K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D and Sliwa K (2013) Peripartum cardiomyopathy, Current Opinion in Critical Care, 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328364d7db, 19:5, (397-403), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Walenta K, Schwarz V, Schirmer S, Kindermann I, Friedrich E, Solomayer E, Sliwa K, Labidi S, Hilfiker-Kleiner D and Bohm M (2012) Circulating microparticles as indicators of peripartum cardiomyopathy, European Heart Journal, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr485, 33:12, (1469-1479), Online publication date: 2-Jun-2012. Knöll R, Iaccarino G, Tarone G, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Bauersachs J, Leite-Moreira A, Sugden P and Balligand J (2014) Towards a re-definition of ‘cardiac hypertrophy’ through a rational characterization of left ventricular phenotypes: a position paper of the Working Group ‘Myocardial Function’ of the ESC, European Journal of Heart Failure, 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr071, 13:8, (811-819), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011. Girolami F, Ho C, Semsarian C, Baldi M, Will M, Baldini K, Torricelli F, Yeates L, Cecchi F, Ackerman M and Olivotto I (2010) Clinical Features and Outcome of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Associated With Triple Sarcomere Protein Gene Mutations, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.062, 55:14, (1444-1453), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. Xu Q, Dewey S, Nguyen S and Gomes A (2010) Malignant and benign mutations in familial cardiomyopathies: Insights into mutations linked to complex cardiovascular phenotypes, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.03.005, 48:5, (899-909), Online publication date: 1-May-2010. Coats C and Elliott P (2008) Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1007/s11936-008-0042-9, 10:6, (496-504), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. Goodlin S (2013) Why should palliative care clinicians learn about heart failure?, Progress in Palliative Care, 10.1179/096992608X346224, 16:5-6, (215-219), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. April 8, 2008Vol 117, Issue 14 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.767657PMID: 18391120 Originally publishedApril 8, 2008 KeywordscardiomyopathyEditorialsgeneticsPDF download Advertisement SubjectsAnimal Models of Human Disease