Abstract

As infectious disease surveillance systems expand to include digital, crowd-sourced, and social network data, public health agencies are gaining unprecedented access to high-resolution data and have an opportunity to selectively monitor informative individuals. Contact networks, which are the webs of interaction through which diseases spread, determine whether and when individuals become infected, and thus who might serve as early and accurate surveillance sensors. Here, we evaluate three strategies for selecting sensors—sampling the most connected, random, and friends of random individuals—in three complex social networks—a simple scale-free network, an empirical Venezuelan college student network, and an empirical Montreal wireless hotspot usage network. Across five different surveillance goals—early and accurate detection of epidemic emergence and peak, and general situational awareness—we find that the optimal choice of sensors depends on the public health goal, the underlying network and the reproduction number of the disease (R0). For diseases with a low R0, the most connected individuals provide the earliest and most accurate information about both the onset and peak of an outbreak. However, identifying network hubs is often impractical, and they can be misleading if monitored for general situational awareness, if the underlying network has significant community structure, or if R0 is high or unknown. Taking a theoretical approach, we also derive the optimal surveillance system for early outbreak detection but find that real-world identification of such sensors would be nearly impossible. By contrast, the friends-of-random strategy offers a more practical and robust alternative. It can be readily implemented without prior knowledge of the network, and by identifying sensors with higher than average, but not the highest, epidemiological risk, it provides reasonably early and accurate information.

Highlights

  • Public health agencies rely on diverse sources of information for detecting emerging outbreaks, situational awareness, prediction of future burden, and triggering initiation of control measures

  • The most connected strategy selects subsets of nodes that are most likely to experience earlier and more intense epidemics, whereas the random strategy yields collections of sensors that are highly representative of the population as a whole (Fig 3)

  • While random representative sampling is a good rule-of-thumb and has guided the development of numerous surveillance systems, we can improve the timeliness of surveillance by exploiting our evolving understanding of social networks and their impacts on infectious disease dynamics [24, 28,29,30, 45, 49, 52,53,54,55, 62, 63]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Public health agencies rely on diverse sources of information for detecting emerging outbreaks, situational awareness (e.g., estimating prevalence or severity), prediction of future burden, and triggering initiation of control measures. In 2009, Google Flu Trends—a detection algorithm for internet search queries of influenza-related terms—brought next-generation indicator-based syndromic surveillance to the forefront of public health [6,7,8,9,10,11]. In the last few years, next-generation surveillance has exploded with efforts to combine both event and syndromic indicator data from search engines [15, 16], crowdsourcing (e.g., Flu Near You in the US and Influenzanet in Europe) [17, 18], Twitter (e.g., MappyHealth) [19, 20], and Facebook [21, 22] While these new approaches are promising, public health agencies face the significant challenge of comprehensively integrating these diverse data sources to achieve specific surveillance objectives. Many generation data sources, whether passively scraping data gathered for an incidental purpose or actively engaging volunteer participants, can be used to infer the underlying network through which disease, opinions or information spreads

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call