Abstract
Discussions in the working group were led by a panel of five speakers: Lavanya Rajamani of the Centre for Policy Research (India), Daniel Bodansky of Arizona State University (USA), Jacqueline Peel of Melbourne Law School (Australia), Marc Pallemaerts of the University of Amsterdam (Netherlands), and Dirk Messner of the German Development Institute (Germany). On the eve of the 17th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 7th Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, discussions focused on two themes: (1) the future of the Kyoto Protocol and (2) the respective merits of top-down versus bottom-up approaches. They proceeded against the backdrop of a widening gap between what science tells us would be required to prevent 'dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system' in accordance with Article 2 of the UNFCCC and what is happening in reality. Keywords:COP; Daniel Bodansky; Dirk Messner; International Climate Policy; Jacqueline Peel; Kyoto Protocol; Lavanya Rajamani; Marc Pallemaerts; UNFCCC
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
