Abstract

The observation of general increase in the seismic activity of an area for an extended period before a major event has been reported on a number of occasions. Well-known examples are those associated with the great earthquakes in Japan in 1891 and 1923. The authors have made a creditable effort to convert this rather indefinite and elusive phenomenon into a precisely definable one. It is important that they confirm the necessity of considering a very extensive region including the center of the approaching event. It is very rarely true that a major event is preceded by increasing activity in its immediate vicinity. Such a claim was made by Davison for the Japanese occurrence of 1891; critical reading suggests that he overlooked many details and misinterpreted the data.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.