Abstract
As presented by Shildrick, questions are raised with regard to Lacan's theory elucidating the underpinnings for negative attitudes concerning sexual activity with and by disabled persons. Discussed, too, are other assumptions stemming from psychoanalytic theory that seem to be pertinent to sexuality and the disabled. For example, does the concept of polymorphousness in relation to particular sexual behavior necessarily imply perversity? Still other assumptions have stimulated me to make additions or tentative amendments to the dialog. Along the way, suggestions for further research are advanced.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
